Articles | Volume 63, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-63-277-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
Related authors
Related subject area
Subject: Product quality | Animal: Sheep
Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging on quality characteristics of lamb meat
Fatty acids, health lipid indices, and cholesterol content of sheep meat of three breeds from Moroccan pastures
Fatty acid profile of muscles and adipose tissues of fat-tail Barbarine lambs as affected by rosemary residue intake
The effect of genotype and muscle type on the physico-chemical characteristics and taurine, carnosine and L-carnitine concentration in lamb meat
Chemical composition and fatty acid content in lamb and adult sheep meat
Arch. Anim. Breed., 64, 437–445,
2021Arch. Anim. Breed., 63, 471–482,
2020Arch. Anim. Breed., 63, 431–439,
2020Arch. Anim. Breed., 63, 423–430,
2020Arch. Anim. Breed., 63, 261–268,
2020Cited articles
Arshad, M. S., Sohaib, M., Ahmad, R. S., Nadeem, M. T., Imran, A., Arshad,
M. U., Kwon, J., and Amjad, Z.: Ruminant meat flavor influenced by different
factors with special reference to fatty acids, Lipids Health Dis., 17, 1–13,
2018.
Christensen, L. B.: Drip loss sampling in porcine m. longissimus dorsi, Meat
Sci., 63, 469–477, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00106-7, 2003.
Correa, J. A., Méthot, S., and Faucitano, L.: A modified meat juice
container (EZ-DripLoss) procedure for a more reliable assessment of drip
loss and related quality changes in pork meat, J. Muscle Foods, 18, 67–77,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2007.00066.x, 2007.
European Communities: Council Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009 of 24 September
2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, Official Journal
of the European Communities, L 303, 1–30, 2009.
Filho, R. D. A. T., Cazedey, H. P., Fontes, P. R., Ramos, A. D. L. S.,
and Ramos, E. M.: Drip loss assessment by different analytical methods and their
relationships with pork quality classification, J. Food Qual., 2017, 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9170768, 2017.