Journal cover Journal topic
Archives Animal Breeding Archiv Tierzucht
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 0.991
IF0.991
IF 5-year value: 1.217
IF 5-year
1.217
CiteScore value: 2.0
CiteScore
2.0
SNIP value: 1.055
SNIP1.055
IPP value: 1.27
IPP1.27
SJR value: 0.425
SJR0.425
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 28
Scimago H
index
28
h5-index value: 13
h5-index13
Supported by
Logo Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology
Volume 57, issue 1
Arch. Anim. Breed., 57, 17, 2014
https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-017
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Arch. Anim. Breed., 57, 17, 2014
https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-017
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  30 Jun 2014

30 Jun 2014

Fatty acid profile of m. longissimus dorsi of Mangalitsa and Moravka pig breeds

Milica Petrović1, Martin Wähner2, Čedomir Radović3, Dragan Radojković1, Nenad Parunović4, Radomir Savić1, and Nenad Brkić5 Milica Petrović et al.
  • 1Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia
  • 2Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Bernburg, Germany
  • 3Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia
  • 4Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 5Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management – Directorate for Water, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract. The objective of this study was to determine the chemical composition and fatty acid content in m. longissimus dorsi (MLD) of two indigenous pig breeds (ML – Swallow-belly Mangalitsa and M – Moravka) reared in free range farm conditions and fed complete mixtures used for commercial meat pig genotypes. The body mass of ML and M pigs at slaughter was,on average, 107.14 and 107.61 kg, respectively. In MLD of M pigs, more total fat was measured compared to ML breed (6.96 % compared to 5.10 %, P<0.05). Protein content in MLD of ML pigs was higher by +0.92 % (P<0.01) compared to M pigs. Male castrates of M pigs had more fat compared to gilts of the same breed (8.64 compared to 5.29 %), and the 3.35 % difference between mean values was statistically significant (P<0.05). The breed of pigs influenced the total saturated fatty acids (P=0.011) and mono-unsaturated fatty acid (P=0.003) contents, but not the content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (P=0.325). In the case of saturated fatty acids in the MLD of ML and M pigs, the most common were C16:0 (25.05 % and 25.53 %) and C18:0 (12.73 % and 14.40 %). The MLD of M pigs contained 1.67 % more stearic acid compared to ML pigs (P=0.004). Pigs of ML, compared to M pigs, had more C18:1cis-9 (+2.31 %), C16:1 (+0.49 %), C17:1 (+0.10 %) and less C20:1cis-11 (–0.25 %). The content of two essential fatty acids, C18:2n-6 and C18:3n-3, did not vary according to breed or sex of pigs (P>0.05). The n-6/n-3 ratio was higher than optimal (18.7 for breed ML and 13.7 for M).

Download
Citation