20 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Feasibility of a Sheep Welfare Assessment Tool in the Pre-export Phase of Australian Live Export Industry T. Collins et al. 10.3389/fanim.2021.687162
2. A Systematic Review on Validated Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Pig Production and Its Potential to Assess Animal Welfare Y. Gómez et al. 10.3389/fvets.2021.660565
3. Behavioural complexity in fattening pigs I. Video-based validation of a novel welfare indicator according to varying intensity of housing conditions C. Raudies et al. 10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106605
4. Interobserver Reliability of the Animal Welfare Indicators Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses I. Czycholl et al. 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.005
5. In pursuit of peak animal welfare; the need to prioritize the meaningful over the measurable J. Veasey 10.1002/zoo.21390
6. Evaluation of consistency over time of the use of the Animal Welfare Indicators protocol for horses I. Czycholl et al. 10.7120/09627286.30.1.081
7. Reliability of different behavioural tests for growing pigs on-farm I. Czycholl et al. 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.02.004
8. Assessing Decision Support Tools for Mitigating Tail Biting in Pork Production: Current Progress and Future Directions S. Ward et al. 10.3390/ani14020224
9. Animal welfare definitions, frameworks, and assessment tools: Advancing the measurement and laying the foundation for improved animal welfare through a three-step approach F. van der Staay et al. 10.1017/awf.2025.23
10. Using Expert Elicitation to Abridge the Welfare Quality® Protocol for Monitoring the Most Adverse Dairy Cattle Welfare Impairments F. Tuyttens et al. 10.3389/fvets.2021.634470
11. Assessing measures of animal welfare H. Browning 10.1007/s10539-022-09862-1
12. Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Monitoring of Pigs’ Physico-Temporal Activities at Different Greenhouse Gas Concentrations A. Bhujel et al. 10.3390/ani11113089
13. The construction of a measure of behavioural complexity as a potential individual-based welfare indicator and its theoretical validation C. Raudies & L. Gygax 10.1017/awf.2024.48
14. The Combination of Serum and Oral Fluid Cortisol Levels and Welfare Quality Protocol® for Assessment of Pig Welfare on Intensive Farms J. Plut et al. 10.3390/agriculture13020351
15. Towards an industry-wide, multilevel evaluation framework for pig meat inspection: potential applications and implementation challenges A. Zisis et al. 10.1016/j.animal.2025.101577
16. Health scores for farmed animals: Screening pig health with register data from public and private databases F. Nienhaus et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0228497
17. Discrepancies between farmers' perceptions and actual animal welfare conditions on commercial pig farms E. Nadlučnik et al. 10.3389/fvets.2022.1010791
18. How Far Are We From Data-Driven and Animal-Based Welfare Assessment? A Critical Analysis of European Quality Schemes A. Stygar et al. 10.3389/fanim.2022.874260
19. Validity and reliability of animal-based measures of welfare protocols in finisher pigs M. Coutant et al. 10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105704
20. Effects of exercise and roughage source on the health and performance of receiving beef calves M. Woolsoncroft et al. 10.15232/pas.2017-01673