41 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The Meat Quality Characteristics of Holstein Calves: The Story of Israeli ‘Dairy Beef’ A. Shabtay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102308
2. Generic physiologically based kinetic modelling for farm animals: Part I. Data collection of physiological parameters in swine, cattle and sheep L. Lautz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.10.021
3. Feed Efficiency and Physiological Parameters of Holstein and Crossbred Holstein × Simmental Cows D. Knob et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101668
4. Effects of the Breeding Strategy Beef-on-Dairy at Animal, Farm and Sector Levels R. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132182
5. A framework for quantitative analysis of livestock systems using theoretical concepts of production ecology A. van der Linden et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.06.007
6. Metabolomic profiles indicate distinct physiological pathways affected by two loci with major divergent effect on Bos taurus growth and lipid deposition R. Weikard et al. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00120.2010
7. Energy expenditure, urea kinetics, and body weight gain within a segregating resource family population P. Lahann et al. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2808
8. Differentially Expressed miRNA-Gene Targets Related to Intramuscular Fat in Musculus Longissimus Dorsi of Charolais × Holstein F2-Crossbred Bulls B. Mir et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060700
9. Model-based exploration of the impact of glucose metabolism on the estrous cycle dynamics in dairy cows M. Omari et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-019-0256-7
10. LiGAPS-Beef, a mechanistic model to explore potential and feed-limited beef production 1: model description and illustration A. van der Linden et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001726
11. Cultured beef: from small biopsy to substantial quantity L. Melzener et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10663
12. Effects of dairy × beef crossbreeding in two Swedish forage-based beef production systems with intact bulls E. Nadeau et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2025.2576872
13. Perilipin, C/EBPα, and C/EBPβ mRNA abundance in longissimus muscle and different adipose tissues of Holstein and Charolais cattle J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.04.009
14. Identification of Selection Signatures in Cattle Breeds Selected for Dairy Production A. Stella et al. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.116111
15. Morphology of small intestinal mucosa and intestinal weight change with metabolic type of cattle R. Zitnan et al. https://doi.org/10.17221/1968-VETMED
16. Impact of Breed and Slaughter Hygiene on Beef Carcass Quality Traits in Northern Greece V. Papanikolopoulou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101776
17. Effects of herd management decisions on dairy cow longevity, farm profitability, and emissions of enteric methane – a simulation study of milk and beef production J. Clasen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.101051
18. Retinol binding protein 4 abundance in plasma and tissues is related to body fat deposition in cattle Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44509-4
19. Agouti Signaling Protein and Its Receptors as Potential Molecular Markers for Intramuscular and Body Fat Deposition in Cattle Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00172
20. Evaluation of Slaughter Weights and Carcass Traits of Bulls Marketed in South Marmara Region of Turkey S. Ardıclı et al. https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.470728
21. Market potential for organic dairy and meat products from “calf-friendly” dairy farms across different consumer segments M. Herrler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-025-00499-4
22. Comparison of the Carcass and Beef Quality of the Czech Fleckvieh Bulls with Genotype TT and CT for Leptin and Bulls of Galloway and Charolais Breeds R. Filipčík et al. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010029
23. Epigenomics and genotype-phenotype association analyses reveal conserved genetic architecture of complex traits in cattle and human S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00792-6
24. Waste not, want not: Value chain stakeholder attitudes to surplus dairy calf management in Australia S. Bolton et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2024.4
25. Effects of sire breed and calving ease on growth performance and carcass traits of bull calves from Holstein-Friesian females A. Boldt et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029925101842
26. Consumer Evaluations and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force of Foodservice Tenderloin Steaks Sourced From Different Market Classes of Domestic and Imported Beef S. Boleman et al. https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.19816
27. Relationships between intramuscular fat content, selected carcass traits, and fatty acid profile in bulls using a F2-population A. Hoehne et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.10.005
28. The role of animal welfare in improving the future of farming R. Doyle et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21562
29. Meat quality and fatty acid profile of the musculus longissimus lumborum in Czech Fleckvieh, Charolais and Charolais × Czech Fleckvieh bulls fed different types of silages L. Bartoň et al. https://doi.org/10.17221/1713-CJAS
30. Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Yields of Native Calves×Holstein and Native Calves× Simmental Crossbreds A. Mirshamsollahi et al. https://doi.org/10.61186/rap.15.43.42
31. Energy Balance Indicators during the Transition Period and Early Lactation of Purebred Holstein and Simmental Cows and Their Crosses D. Knob et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020309
32. Bypass fat enhances liveweight gain and meat quality but not profitability of smallholder cattle fattening systems based on oil palm frond O. Pimpa et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20202
33. Body composition and composition of gain of growing beef bulls fed rations with varying energy concentrations A. Honig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108685
34. Influence of dietary energy concentration and body weight at slaughter on carcass tissue composition and beef cuts of modern type Fleckvieh (German Simmental) bulls A. Honig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108209
35. A review of rumen parameters in bovines with divergent feed efficiencies: What do these parameters tell us about improving animal productivity and sustainability? P. Fregulia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104761
36. Comprehensive assessment of candidate genes associated with fattening performance in Holstein–Friesian bulls S. Ardicli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-9-2019
37. Effects of polymorphisms at <i>LEP</i>, <i>CAST</i>, <i>CAPN1</i>, <i>GHR</i>, <i>FABP4</i> and <i>DGAT1</i> genes on fattening performance and carcass traits in Simmental bulls S. Ardicli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-61-2017
38. Identification of Cattle Background, Environmental, and Abattoir Factors Influencing Variability in United States Beef Carcasses Using Grading Camera Ribeye Color Scores T. Dobbins et al. https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.24994
39. Diversification not specialization reduces global and local environmental burdens from livestock production A. Soteriades et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.031
40. Modelling the physiological, muscular, and sensory characteristics in relation to beef quality from 15 cattle breeds J. Albechaalany et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105395
41. Holstein and Angus Crossbreeding on Feedlot: Impacts on Metabolism, Ruminal Fermentation, Performance, and Meat Quality G. Giraldi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants6030070