Journal cover Journal topic
Archives Animal Breeding Archiv Tierzucht
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 0.991
IF0.991
IF 5-year value: 1.217
IF 5-year
1.217
CiteScore value: 2.0
CiteScore
2.0
SNIP value: 1.055
SNIP1.055
IPP value: 1.27
IPP1.27
SJR value: 0.425
SJR0.425
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 28
Scimago H
index
28
h5-index value: 13
h5-index13
Supported by
Logo Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology Logo Leibniz Association
Volume 60, issue 2
Arch. Anim. Breed., 60, 145–151, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-145-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Arch. Anim. Breed., 60, 145–151, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-145-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Original study 09 Jun 2017

Original study | 09 Jun 2017

Evidence on the stability of histone H1.a polymorphic variants during selection in quail

Andrzej Kowalski1 and Sebastian Knaga2 Andrzej Kowalski and Sebastian Knaga
  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
  • 2Chair for Biological Bases of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Abstract. The goal of this work was to check whether selection for quantitative traits may cause a change in the histone H1 allelic complement and whether it can therefore be considered a modulator of histone H1-dependent chromatin functioning. For this purpose, a fluctuation of histone H1.a polymorphic variants was analyzed among a non-selected (control) quail line and the line selected for a high cholesterol content in the egg yolk. The histone H1.a was found to be polymorphic due to its differential migration rate in the AU-PAGE (acetic acid–urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Based on this, two H1.a isoforms (H1.a1 and H1.a2) that form three phenotypes (a1, a2 and a1a2) were distinguished in the quail lines tested. A comparably expressed (p > 0. 05) and low relative variable (coefficient of variation, CV  < 0. 25) histone H1.a phenotypes were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in both the non-selected (χ2 = 1. 29, p = 0. 25) and selected (χ2 = 1. 9, p = 0. 16) quail line. The similarity among quail lines was assessed based on the equal distribution of histone H1.a phenotypes (χ2 = 1. 63, p = 0. 44) and alleles (χ2 = 0. 018, p = 0. 89) frequency in both quail lines tested. This indicates that selection does not affect the histone H1.a polymorphic variants. The stability of histone H1.a during selection might suggest that likely chromatin processes coupled to the selected trait are not linked to the activity of histone H1.a.

Download
Citation