Journal cover Journal topic
Archives Animal Breeding Archiv Tierzucht
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 0.991
IF0.991
IF 5-year value: 1.217
IF 5-year
1.217
CiteScore value: 2.0
CiteScore
2.0
SNIP value: 1.055
SNIP1.055
IPP value: 1.27
IPP1.27
SJR value: 0.425
SJR0.425
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 28
Scimago H
index
28
h5-index value: 13
h5-index13
Supported by
Logo Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology Logo Leibniz Association
Volume 50, issue 2
Arch. Anim. Breed., 50, 147–154, 2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-50-147-2007
© Author(s) 2007. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Arch. Anim. Breed., 50, 147–154, 2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-50-147-2007
© Author(s) 2007. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  10 Oct 2007

10 Oct 2007

Comparison of Breeding Values for Daily Gains of Bulls Estimated with Multi-Trait and Random Regression Models

H. Krejčová1, N. Mielenz1, J. Přibyl2, and L. Schüler1 H. Krejčová et al.
  • 1Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry with Veterinary Clinic, Germany
  • 2Res. Inst. Anim. Prod., Uhříněves, Czech Republic

Abstract. In this study, random regression models with Legendre polynomials of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree (RR2, RR3 and RR4) are compared with regard to the estimation of breeding values for the average daily gain of Czech Pied bulls (Simmental type). The data were prepared such that a multi-trait model (MTM) could be used as reference model. For each bull, 8 repeated records or fewer were available for the testing period from the 12th to the 420th day of life. For the modeling of the expected value structure, the fixed regression coefficients of the Legendre polynomials were subordinated hierarchically to the herd-year-season effects (HYS). For the comparison of the random regression models with the reference model, rank correlations between the estimated breeding values of various animal groups were calculated and a variety of top-lists were analyzed. In general, models RR3 and RR4 returned higher rank correlations with MTM in comparison to model RR2. Additionally, the number of common animals in the 1% and 10% top-lists showed that models RR3 and RR4 are to be preferred over RR2 when it comes to the estimation of breeding values.

Download
Citation