Journal cover Journal topic
Archives Animal Breeding Archiv Tierzucht
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 0.991
IF0.991
IF 5-year value: 1.217
IF 5-year
1.217
CiteScore value: 2.0
CiteScore
2.0
SNIP value: 1.055
SNIP1.055
IPP value: 1.27
IPP1.27
SJR value: 0.425
SJR0.425
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 28
Scimago H
index
28
h5-index value: 13
h5-index13
Supported by
Logo Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology Logo Leibniz Association
Volume 42, issue 3
Arch. Anim. Breed., 42, 267–280, 1999
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-42-267-1999
© Author(s) 1999. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Arch. Anim. Breed., 42, 267–280, 1999
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-42-267-1999
© Author(s) 1999. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  10 Oct 1999

10 Oct 1999

Planungsrechnungen zur Optimierung von Zuchtplänen der Rasse Merinofleischschaf

U. Müller1, K. Strittmatter2, and G. Nitter3 U. Müller et al.
  • 1Sächsische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Am Park 3, 04860 Köllitsch, Germany
  • 2Sächsische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Bomaische Str. 31/33, 04416 Markkleeberg, Germany
  • 3Universität Hohenheim Institut für Tierhaltung und Tierzüchtung, Garbenstraße 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany

Abstract. Title of the paper: Alternative selection strategies for the Mutton Merino breed to optimize breedine Systems
This paper deals with the investigation of alternative selection strategies for the Mutton Merino breed to improve lamb meat production and fertility. A main topic is the application of ultrasonic scanning to evaluate the meat content on live animals. The aim of model calculations was the optimisation and comparison of five different selection strategies within three different schemes of gene dissimation. First a basic scheme was defined and optimised (selection on field records, one-step selection, no scanning). It was regarded as the reference scheme to which all other breeding Systems were related. The following schemes considered both, selection with and without scanning. A second scheme, also based on field records, includes two-step selection of rams (called improved field test scheme). In a third and fourth scheme a level of uniform environment was assumed for ram progeny testing. These are a central testing Station on the one hand with slaughtering and carcass evaluation on progeny, and one or more contract farms on the other (without slaughtering). For a fifth selection scheme an open nucleus was assumed with ram progeny testing in associated test herds.

In a dcterministic approach using the ZPLAN Computer program, the monetary genetic gain for the breeding objeetive (traits lambs weaned, litter weight at weaning, postweaning daily gain and lean meat content) and the profit were calculated for each scheme after optimisation of various biological-technical coefficients. The highest profit was achieved with a nucleus scheme (DM 9,16). Due to low recording costs the basic scheme was second (DM 7,19) and, because of high costs, the Station scheme was last (DM 4,22). The other two schemes were intermediate (DM 6,98 for the scheme with contract farms and DM 6,58 for the improved field test scheme). On an average over all schemes, scanning resulted in a 0,24 DM (i.e. almost 30 per cent) increase of the monetary genetic gain and a threefold higher genetic gain for lean meat percentage. In all schemes scanning lead also to a higher profit because the higher retum of selection based on scanning exceeded the higher costs.

Download
Citation