<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AAB</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Archives Animal Breeding</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AAB</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Arch. Anim. Breed.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2363-9822</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/aab-62-69-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Hypomethylation in the promoter region of <italic>ZPBP</italic> as <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> a potential litter size
indicator in Berkshire pigs</article-title><alt-title>Hypomethylation in the promoter region</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Hypomethylation in the promoter region}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~M.~An et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>Sang Mi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2617-2025</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>Seulgi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>Jung Hye</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Go Eun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>Deok Gyeong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Da Hye</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Tae Wan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Hwa Chun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ha</surname><given-names>Jeongim</given-names></name>
          <email>jiha@gntech.ac.kr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Chul Wook</given-names></name>
          <email>cwkim@gntech.ac.kr</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Swine Science and Technology Center, Gyeongnam National University of
Science &amp; Technology, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Jinju, 52725, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Dasan Pig Breeding Co., Namwon, 55716, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jeongim Ha (jiha@gntech.ac.kr) and Chul Wook Kim (cwkim@gntech.ac.kr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>62</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>69</fpage><lpage>76</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Sang Mi An et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019.html">This article is available from https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e175">In pigs, litter size is typically defined as the total number of piglets born
(TNB) or the number of piglets born alive (NBA). Increasing pig litter size
is of great economic interest as a means to increase productivity. The
capacity of the uterus is a critical component of litter size and may play a
central role in prolificacy. In this study, we investigated
litter-size-related epigenetic markers in uterine tissue from Berkshire pigs
with smaller litter size groups (SLGs) and larger litter size groups (LLGs)
using genome-wide bisulfite sequencing (GWBS). A total of 3269 differentially
methylated regions (DMRs) were identified: 1566 were hypermethylated and 1703
hypomethylated in LLG compared to SLG. The zona pellucida binding protein
(<italic>ZPBP</italic>) gene was significantly hypomethylated in the LLG promoter
region, and its expression was significantly upregulated in uterine tissue.
Thus, the methylation status of <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene was identified as a
potential indicator of litter size. Furthermore, we verified its negative
correlation with litter size traits (TNB and NBA) in whole blood samples from
172 Berkshire sows as a blood-based biomarker by a porcine
methylation-specific restriction enzyme polymerase chain reaction (PMP)
assay. The results suggest that the methylation status of the <italic>ZPBP</italic>
gene can serve as a valuable epigenetic biomarker for hyperprolific sows.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e194">In commercial pig farming, increasing litter size is of great economic
interest as a means to increase production (Balcells et al., 2011; Nielsen et
al., 2013; Rutherford et al., 2013). Litter size is typically defined as the
total number of piglets born (TNB) or the number of piglets born alive (NBA).
Litter size is controlled by many factors, such as ovulation rate (number of
ovulated eggs), number of corpora lutea, fertilization rate, uterine
capacity, and prenatal survival (Distl, 2007; Mesa et al., 2003). Fetal
survival is primarily determined by the uterine capacity of the dam, which
can be defined in terms of the relative surface area of placental endometrial
attachment required to support the nutrient requirements of an individual
fetus throughout gestation (Wilson et al., 1998). Therefore, uterine traits
can greatly influence litter size. In addition, the low
heritability of litter size (5 %–10 %) suggests that proximate
environmental variables may contribute significantly to variation in it (Dube et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e197">DNA methylation is among the main epigenetic mechanisms and plays
significant roles in gene silencing (Newell-Price et al.,
2000), tissue differentiation (Laurent et al., 2010), cellular
development (Smith and Meissner, 2013), X-chromosome  inactivation
(Pollex and Heard, 2012), and genetic imprinting (Li
et al., 1993). Importantly, DNA methylation is both stably heritable and
fully reversible. DNA methylation may reflect interactions between genetic
and environmental factors in the development and reproduction of pigs. In
particular, when DNA methylation occurs in a gene promoter, it typically
acts to repress gene transcription. Several studies have suggested a
correlation between differentially methylated regions (DMRs) near promoter
regions and gene expression changes (Lister et al., 2009; Meissner et
al., 2008; Varley et al., 2013). Furthermore, these types of dynamic<?pagebreak page70?> changes
in DNA methylation tend to occur during embryonic development as cells
differentiate or become reprogrammed (Hajkova et al., 2002; Mayer et al.,
2000; Sasaki and Matsui, 2008). Many recent studies have examined the
genome-wide methylation profiles of livestock phenotypes associated with
disease resistance, milk production, and reproduction (Congras et al.,
2014; Coster et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2012). DNA
methylation affects the expression of many genes that are critical to
reproductive traits (Calicchio et al., 2014; Messerschmidt et al., 2014;
Stevenson and Prendergast, 2013). Hwang et al. (2017) recently identified
DMRs and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with litter size
in pig placentas and suggested that the <italic>PRKG2</italic>, <italic>CLCA4</italic>, and <italic>PCK1</italic> genes play important roles
in improving litter size by increasing nutrition supply through the
placenta.</p>
      <p id="d1e209">The objective of this study was to use epigenetic approaches to examine
uterine tissues of Berkshire pigs with smaller and larger litter sizes,
using genome-wide bisulfite sequencing (GWBS) technology. Our findings will
provide useful knowledge and a clearer understanding of the reproductive
phenotypes of individual pigs and could help in selecting sows with high
fecundity for breeding.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e214">Comparison of average of TNB between SLG and LLG. The bars represent
the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Significantly different between both groups at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. TNB: total
number of piglets born; SLG: smaller litter size group; LLG: larger litter
size group.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Animals and sample preparation</title>
      <p id="d1e274">All animal experiments were approved by the Gyeongnam National University of
Science and Technology Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (permit
no. 2105-5). All Berkshire sows used in this study were reared under the same
environmental conditions (Dasan Pig Breeding Co., Namwon, Korea) and provided
with the same commercial diet and water ad libitum. To analyze DNA
profiling according to litter size, animals were divided into smaller litter
size groups (SLGs; average litter size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and larger litter size groups
(LLGs; average litter size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and three sows were randomly selected
from each group (Fig. 1). The uterus was collected immediately after
slaughter and flushed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); the endometrium
was then separated from the uterus. The collected endometrium was rapidly
frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until further
analysis. To verify the usefulness of the candidate gene as a prognostic
tool, whole blood samples were collected from 172 sows using BD Vacutainer
K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> EDTA tubes (BD, Oxford, UK) as an anticoagulant. Blood was mixed
immediately after the draw by inverting the tubes 10 times and then stored
at 2–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until use.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>DNA methylation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for marker selection</title>
      <p id="d1e346">Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from three endometrium tissues per group
using a DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and pooled for GWBS
analyses. gDNA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g) was fragmented by ultrasonication to
approximately 100–300 bps and then end-repaired, 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-end
adenylated, and ligated with adapters. Fragmented DNA was bisulfite-converted
using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA).
Bisulfite-converted DNA was quantified using a Quant-iT dsDNA High
Sensitivity Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) on an Agilent
2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and used
as a template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. After
quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplification, the resulting libraries were subjected
to paired-end sequencing with a 100 bp read length using the Illumina HiSeq
2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The raw sequencing reads were
cleaned by removing adaptor sequences, and reads with a percentage of unknown
bases greater than 10 % and low-quality reads (more than
20 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Q20 bases) were filtered out to retain only high-quality
reads. Clean reads were then mapped to the pig reference genome (Sscrofa
10.2) using Bismark software (version 0.9.0) with two allowed mismatches
(Krueger and Andrews, 2011). Methylated cytosines were extracted from aligned
reads using the Bismark methylation extractor with standard parameters. The
methylation level of a cytosine (C) within an aligned read was determined by
calculating the ratio of the number of reads containing a methylated C at the
location to the number of all reads covering the location. DMRs between the
two groups were predicted using CpG_MP with the default parameters (length,
cytosine–guanine (CG) content, and cytosine : phosphate : guanine (CpG)
ratio) (Su et al., 2013). We identified differentially methylated genes
(DMGs) when a DMR and specific gene function element (e.g., a promoter)
overlapped in the University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser
Database. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed for gene<?pagebreak page71?> functional
annotation using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (version 6.7;
<uri>http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/</uri>, last access: 13 April 2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e389">Primer sequences used for PMP assay and RT-PCR.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Application</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Accession no.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Primer (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Product size</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">PMP assay</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1"><italic>ZPBP</italic></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">NC_010451.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">F: TCAGGTGAGGCGTCGGCAT</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">162</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">R: CGTCATCAATGTCCAGTCCT</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="3">RT-PCR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1"><italic>ZPBP</italic></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">NM_214106.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">F: CTGGATTAACCGCTGCTTTC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">158</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">R: ATGCTTTTGCTCCAAACACC</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" morerows="1"><italic>PPIA</italic></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1">NM_214353.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">F: CACAAACGGTTCCCAGTTTT</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1">171</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">R: TGTCCACAGTCAGCAATGGT</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e392">F: forward; R: reverse.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Porcine methylation-specific restriction enzyme PCR assay</title>
      <p id="d1e531">The Porcine methylation-specific restriction enzyme PCR (PMP) assay is a
PCR-based methylation method that uses methylation-sensitive restriction
enzymes to determine DNA methylation status. To verify the result of GWBS,
whole blood samples were collected from Berkshire sows to isolate gDNA using
a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according
to the manufacturer's instructions and digested with <italic>Hpa</italic>II (NEB,
Hitchin, UK) and <italic>Msp</italic>I (NEB), a pair of methylation-sensitive
isoschizomers that have the same recognition site (CC|GG). An undigested gDNA
(5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g) served as the negative control. Gene-specific primers were
designed to flank the <italic>Hpa</italic>II/<italic>Msp</italic>I sites; these are described
in Table 1. PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 30 s, and 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s. The products were electrophoresed on
a 2 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) agarose gel in 6X loading buffer (Biosesang, Seongnam,
Korea).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Reverse-transcription PCR analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e610">Reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis was performed to detect gene expression. Total RNA was extracted from
three uterine tissues from each group using the TRIzol Reagent (Molecular
Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA) and then reverse-transcribed into cDNA
using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
cDNA was then subjected to RT-PCR to evaluate the relative gene expression
levels of the zona pellucida binding protein (<italic>ZPBP</italic>) and the
gene encoding peptidylprolyl isomerase A (<italic>PPIA</italic>) (internal
control), using appropriate primer pairs (Table 1). Amplification was
performed using a Perkin Elmer 9700 system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA,
USA) under the following conditions: 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 5 min; 30 cycles of
95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for
30 s, and final elongation for 7 min at 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The amplification
products were separated on 2 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) agarose gel and quantified using a
Gel Logic model 200 imaging system (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e683">Comparisons between groups were performed using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tests, with statistical
significance determined at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are expressed as
means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation (SD). Linear regression analyses were used
to test the relationships between <italic>ZPBP</italic> methylation status and sow litter size
traits (TNB and NBA). All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS
software (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e718">Summary of sequencing results and reads alignment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Group</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LLG</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Raw reads (no.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 248 683 696</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 217 238 456</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(Read depth, X)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41.62 X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40.57 X</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Analyzed reads (no.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 107 209 686</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 076 828 732</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(88.67 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(88.46 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mapped reads (no.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">662 804 470</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">614 402 588</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(53.08 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(50.475 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Uniquely mapped reads (no.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">594 374 396</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">549 444 152</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(47.60 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(45.14 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Identification of the \textit{ZPBP} gene as an epigenetic marker}?><title>Identification of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene as an epigenetic marker</title>
      <p id="d1e863">GWBS was performed on gDNA from pooled uterus samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both SLG
and LLG). In total, 1249 and 1217 million raw reads were generated in SLG
and LLG, respectively. The mapped reads covered 53.08 % (SLG) and
50.48 % (LLG) of the pig genome (Table 2). A total of 3269 DMRs were
discovered; 1566 were hypermethylated and 1703 were hypomethylated in LLG
compared to SLG (Table 3). The DMRs were determined by considering the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and false discovery rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Among genes with
DMRs, <italic>ZPBP</italic> was found to be strongly related to fecundity by GO
enrichment analysis. This DMG was mainly observed at promoter regions (UP1kb;
1 kb region upstream of transcription start sites) and was hypomethylated in
LLG (Table 4).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p id="d1e919">Numbers and ratio of hyper-DMRs and
hypo-DMRs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hyper-DMRs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Hypo-DMRs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Total number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">of DMRs</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SLG vs. LLG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1566 (47.9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1703 (52.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3269</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e984">DNA methylation plays an important role in regulating gene expression
(Wen et al., 2016). In particular, DNA methylation in
gene promoters is strongly associated with gene silencing (Bell et al.,
2011; Lande-Diner and Cedar, 2005; Weber et al., 2007). Recently, studies
have been conducted to identify the genome-wide methylation profiles of farm
animals (Hao et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2016; Zhang et
al., 2014). Some studies have described DNA methylation for the pig uterus
(Bartol et al., 2008; Franczak et al., 2017; Ko et al., 2008; Pistek et
al., 2013); however, few have reported uterine genome-wide methylation
patterns. GWBS, which allows unbiased genome-wide DNA methylation profiling,
has been used to investigate prolificacy-related DNA methylation in
unprecedented detail (Kurdyukov and Bullock, 2016).
In the current study, we used GWBS to investigate the DNA methylation
profiles of the genome in uterine tissues of high- and low-prolificacy pigs to explore the relationships between DNA methylation and litter size traits.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e991">Information of DNA methylation of
<italic>ZPBP</italic>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Start</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">End</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DMR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Log</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Difference</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Pattern</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">FDR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">position</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>L; cutoff 0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>ZPBP</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chr 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">149 712 887</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">149 713 279</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">UP1kb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">101</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">419</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">348</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22456</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Hypo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e997">FDR: false discovery rate; S: smaller litter size group;
L: larger litter size group.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1228">Methylation analysis of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene in whole blood
samples of Berkshire sows by PMP assay. gDNAs were cut with the
methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes <italic>Hpa</italic>II/<italic>Msp</italic>I.
M: size marker; U: undigested DNA; SLG: smaller litter size group;
LLG: larger litter size group.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page72?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Confirmation of the methylation status of the \textit{ZPBP} gene in whole blood by
PMP assay}?><title>Confirmation of the methylation status of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene in whole blood by
PMP assay</title>
      <p id="d1e1258">To assess the prognostic capability of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene as a blood-based biomarker
for increased litter size, DNA methylation patterns of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene were
verified in whole blood samples collected from three sows, used to obtain
uterus tissues in each group by PMP assay. As shown in Fig. 2, we confirmed
that the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene was hypomethylated in LLG. This result was consistent with
the results of GWBS analysis, and will allow early prediction of litter
sizes in prepubertal gilts from blood samples without slaughter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Gene expression of hypomethylated \textit{ZPBP} in the promoter
region}?><title>Gene expression of hypomethylated <italic>ZPBP</italic> in the promoter
region</title>
      <p id="d1e1280">Next, to investigate the gene expression of <italic>ZPBP</italic> with hypomethylated promoter,
RT-PCR was performed on uterine tissues of three Berkshire sows from each
group. As shown in Fig. 4, <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene expression was significantly upregulated in
LLG, as expected. Promoter methylation generally impedes the binding of
transcription factors and in a second stage leads to chromatin
condensation, with long-term repression of gene expression
(Schubeler, 2015). Therefore, this result supports the hypothesis
that <italic>ZPBP</italic> overexpression in uterine tissue is due to promoter hypomethylation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1294">Correlation between methylation status of <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene and litter size
traits (TNB and NBA) in 172 Berkshire sows using logistic regression
analysis. The band intensities of PMP assay are shown on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis shows TNB <bold>(a)</bold> and NBA <bold>(b)</bold>. TNB: total number of piglets born;
NBA: number of piglets born alive: a.u: arbitrary unit.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1326">As the DNA methylation status of promoter regions could affect gene
expression through changes in chromatin structure or transcription
efficiency (Klose and Bird, 2006; Lorincz et al., 2004), we compared the
genome-wide methylation patterns of high- and low-prolificacy pigs to
identify DMGs that might affect prolificacy traits such as litter size.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e1332">The effect on gene expression of promoter hypomethylated <italic>ZPBP</italic> in
uterine tissues by RT-PCR. The bars represent the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Significantly different between both groups at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. SLG: smaller litter size group; LLG: larger litter size group.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/69/2019/aab-62-69-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Verification of the relationship between methylation status of the
\textit{ZPBP} gene and litter size traits}?><title>Verification of the relationship between methylation status of the
<italic>ZPBP</italic> gene and litter size traits</title>
      <p id="d1e1394">We verified the relationship between methylation status of the <italic>ZPBP</italic>
gene and litter size traits in Berkshire sows (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">172</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a PMP assay
(Fig. 4). The amplified products were normalized using undigested DNA
samples. To determine the relationship, linear regression analyses were
performed; the methylation status of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene exhibited
negative relationships with litter size traits. Logistic regression analyses
of the results of TNB (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1648</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicated the following: TNB
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0069</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.879</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a). When NBA was included in the
model, the relationship was as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1322</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; NBA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6643</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3843</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b). These results confirm that
<italic>ZPBP</italic> methylation status was significantly negatively associated with
litter size traits (TNB and NBA) and that sows with hypomethylated
<italic>ZPBP</italic> had high fecundity. Thus, the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene can act as an
epigenetic marker for early prediction of litter size in Berkshire pigs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1533">Zona pellucida (ZP) is a filamentous matrix of well-structured and
glycosylated glycoproteins surrounding the oocyte that acts as a
morphological criterion for oocyte selection. This matrix is formed of three
proteins encoded by three different genes: ZP1, ZP2, and ZP3 (Pokkyla et
al., 2011; Wassarman, 2008). <italic>ZPBP</italic>, which localizes to the acrosomal membrane
and likely interacts with multiple acrosomal matrix proteins, was named for
its function, binding to the oocyte ZP protein following the acrosome
reaction (Yu et al., 2009). <italic>ZPBP</italic> mainly acts in acrosome
compaction and<?pagebreak page73?> sperm morphogenesis during spermiogenesis. Most research on
<italic>ZPBP</italic> has focused on its location in the acrosome of the sperm and its
function in sperm–oocyte interactions during fertilization (Mori et al.,
1993, 1995; Yu et al., 2006). However, Campbell et al. (2006) reported
that murine <italic>ZPBP</italic> was a luminal epithelium-specific gene with
20-fold or higher expression in the uterine luminal epithelium than in the
stroma–glandular epithelium. Implantation is essential for the
establishment of normal pregnancy and is initiated by a physical interaction
between the trophoblast and the apical surface of the luminal epithelium,
followed rapidly by adhesion and then by penetration through the luminal
epithelium to the underlying stroma, which responds by decidualization
(Abrahamsohn and Zorn, 1993). In other words, the uterine
luminal epithelium plays a critical role in implantation. <italic>ZPBP</italic> is a serine
protease (serine protease 38) with ZP-binding properties that were initially
identified in porcine epididymal sperm (Mori et al., 1993). Serine
proteases are characterized by the presence of serine as a nucleophilic
amino acid at the active site of the enzyme (Hedstrom, 2002). Some
serine proteases are detectable in the uterus and are involved in female
reproduction, especially in oocyte development, ovulation, implantation, and
decidualization (Diao et al., 2013; Nie et al., 2005). Therefore, we
believe that <italic>ZPBP</italic> might play a role in female reproduction, including
implantation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1562">This study reports the DNA methylation patterns of porcine uterine tissues,
which are associated with litter size. We identified DMRs and detected
hypomethylation of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene in its promoter region in LLG; its expression
was upregulated in uterine tissues. We also verified that the methylation
status of the <italic>ZPBP</italic> gene was significantly negatively associated with litter size
traits in the larger pig population. Our results demonstrate that this gene
can be used as a biomarker for hyperprolific sows and will likely contribute
to improving reproductive capacity.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1577">The data sets are available upon request from
the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1583">SMA curated data and wrote this paper.
SK, JHH and GEY performed the experiments. DGK, DHP and TWK analyzed the data. HCP provided the resources.
JH and CWK supervised the research
project.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1589">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1595">Research was supported by grants from the Basic Science Research Program
(no. 2017R1A6A3A11035414) and Priority Research Centers Program
(no. 2011-0022965) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and the Export
Promotion Technology Development Program (no. 313012-05) of the Ministry of
Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Steffen Maak<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abrahamsohn, P. A. and Zorn, T. M.: Implantation and decidualization in
rodents, J. Exp. Zool., 266, 603–628, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Balcells, I., Castello, A., Mercade, A., Noguera, J. L.,
Fernandez-Rodriguez, A., Sanchez, A., and Tomas, A.: Analysis of porcine
MUC4 gene as a candidate gene for prolificacy QTL on SSC13 in an Iberian x
Meishan F2 population, BMC Genet., 12,  1–6,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-93" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1471-2156-12-93</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bartol, F. F., Wiley, A. A., and Bagnell, C. A.: Epigenetic programming of
porcine endometrial function and the lactocrine hypothesis, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 43, 273–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01174.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01174.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bell, J. T., Pai, A. A., Pickrell, J. K., Gaffney, D. J., Pique-Regi, R.,
Degner, J. F., Gilad, Y., and Pritchard, J. K.: DNA methylation patterns
associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines,
Genome Biol., 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r10</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Calicchio, R., Doridot, L., Miralles, F., Mehats, C., and Vaiman, D.: DNA
methylation, an epigenetic mode of gene expression regulation in
reproductive science, Curr. Pharm. Design, 20, 1726–1750, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Campbell, E. A., O'Hara, L., Catalano, R. D., Sharkey, A. M., Freeman, T.
C., and Johnson, M. H.: Temporal expression profiling of the uterine luminal
epithelium of the pseudo-pregnant mouse suggests receptivity to the
fertilized egg is associated with complex transcriptional changes, Hum. Reprod., 21, 2495–2513, 2006.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Congras, A., Yerle-Bouissou, M., Pinton, A., Vignoles, F., Liaubet, L.,
Ferchaud, S., and Acloque, H.: Sperm DNA methylation analysis in swine
reveals conserved and species-specific methylation patterns and highlights an
altered methylation at the GNAS locus in infertile boars, Biol. Reprod., 91,
137, 1–14, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Coster, A., Madsen, O., Heuven, H. C., Dibbits, B., Groenen, M. A., van
Arendonk, J. A., and Bovenhuis, H.: The imprinted gene DIO3 is a candidate
gene for litter size in pigs, Plos One, 7, e31825,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0031825</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Diao, H., Xiao, S., Li, R., Zhao, F., and Ye, X.: Distinct spatiotemporal
expression of serine proteases Prss23 and Prss35 in periimplantation mouse
uterus and dispensable function of Prss35 in fertility, Plos One, 8, e56757,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056757" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0056757</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Distl, O.: Mechanisms of regulation of litter size in pigs on the genome
level, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 42, 10–16, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dube, B., Mulugeta, S. D., and Dzama, K.: Estimation of genetic and
phenotypic parameters for sow productivity traits in South African Large
White pigs, S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 42, 389–397, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Franczak, A., Zglejc, K., Waszkiewicz, E., Wojciechowicz, B., Martyniak, M.,
Sobotka, W., Okrasa, S., and Kotwica, G.: Periconceptional undernutrition
affects in utero methyltransferase expression and steroid hormone concentrations in uterine
flushings and blood plasma during the peri-implantation period in domestic
pigs, Reproduc. Fert. Develop., 29, 1499–1508, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hajkova, P., Erhardt, S., Lane, N., Haaf, T., El-Maarri, O., Reik, W.,
Walter, J., and Surani, M. A.: Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial
germ cells, Mech. Develop., 117, 15–23, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Hao, Y., Cui, Y., and Gu, X.: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles changes
associated with constant heat stress in pigs as measured by bisulfite
sequencing, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 27507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep27507</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hedstrom, L.: Serine protease mechanism and specificity, Chemical reviews,
102, 4501–4524, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hu, Y., Xu, H., Li, Z., Zheng, X., Jia, X., Nie, Q., and Zhang, X.:
Comparison of the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles between fast-growing
and slow-growing broilers, Plos One, 8, e56411,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0056411</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hwang, J. H., An, S. M., Kwon, S., Park, D. H., Kim, T. W., Kang, D. G., Yu,
G. E., Kim, I. S., Park, H. C., Ha, J., and Kim, C. W.: DNA methylation
patterns and gene expression associated with litter size in Berkshire pig
placenta, Plos One, 12, e0184539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0184539</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jin, L., Jiang, Z., Xia, Y., Lou, P., Chen, L., Wang, H., Bai, L., Xie, Y.,
Liu, Y., Li, W., Zhong, B., Shen, J., Jiang, A., Zhu, L., Wang, J., Li, X.,
and Li, M.: Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in skeletal muscle between
young and middle-aged pigs, BMC Genomics, 15, 653,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-653" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1471-2164-15-653</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Klose, R. J. and Bird, A. P.: Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its
mediators, Trends Biochem. Sci., 31, 89–97, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Ko, Y.-G., Cha, B.-H., Hwang, S., Im, G.-S., Yang, B.-C., Kim, M.-J., Cho,
J.-H., and Seong, H.-H.: Altered DNA Methylation of Repetitive Sequences in
Cloned Porcine Fetus, The Journal of Reproduction and Development Supplement,
578–578, 2008.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Krueger, F. and Andrews, S. R.: Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation
caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications, Bioinformatics, 27,
1571–1572, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Kurdyukov, S. and Bullock, M.: DNA Methylation Analysis: Choosing the Right
Method, Biology, 5, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biology5010003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/biology5010003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Lande-Diner, L. and Cedar, H.: Silence of the genes–mechanisms of long-term
repression, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 648–654, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Laurent, L., Wong, E., Li, G., Huynh, T., Tsirigos, A., Ong, C. T., Low, H.
M., Kin Sung, K. W., Rigoutsos, I., Loring, J., and Wei, C. L.: Dynamic
changes in the human methylome during differentiation, Genome Res., 20,
320–331, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Li, E., Beard, C., and Jaenisch, R.: Role for DNA methylation in genomic
imprinting, Nature, 366, 362–365, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G.,
Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q. M., Edsall, L.,
Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Stewart, R., Ruotti, V., Millar, A. H., Thomson, J.
A., Ren, B., and Ecker, J. R.: Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show
widespread epigenomic differences, Nature, 462, 315–322, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lorincz, M. C., Dickerson, D. R., Schmitt, M., and Groudine, M.: Intragenic
DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in
mammalian cells, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 11, 1068–1075,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, W., Niveleau, A., Walter, J., Fundele, R., and Haaf, T.:
Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome, Nature, 403, 501–502, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko,
A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., Gnirke, A.,
Jaenisch, R., and Lander, E. S.: Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of
pluripotent and differentiated cells, Nature, 454, 766–770, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Mesa, H., Safranski, T. J., Johnson, R. K., and Lamberson, W. R.: Correlated
response in placental efficiency in swine selected for an index of
components of lifter size, J. Anim. Sci., 81, 74–79, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Messerschmidt, D. M., Knowles, B. B., and Solter, D.: DNA methylation
dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation
embryos, Gene. Dev., 28, 812–828, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mori, E., Baba, T., Iwamatsu, A., and Mori, T.: Purification and
characterization of a 38-kDa protein, sp38, with zona pellucida-binding
property from porcine epididymal sperm, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Co., 196, 196–202, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mori, E., Kashiwabara, S., Baba, T., Inagaki, Y., and Mori, T.: Amino acid
sequences of porcine Sp38 and proacrosin required for binding to the zona
pellucida, Dev. Biol., 168, 575–583, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Newell-Price, J., Clark, A. J., and King, P.: DNA methylation and silencing
of gene expression, Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 11,
142–148, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Nie, G., Li, Y., and Salamonsen, L. A.: Serine protease HtrA1 is
developmentally regulated in trophoblast and uterine decidual cells during
placental formation in the mouse, Dev. Dynam., 233, 1102–1109, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Nielsen, B., Su, G., Lund, M. S., and Madsen, P.: Selection for increased
number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and
reduced piglet mortality, J. Anim. Sci., 91, 2575–2582, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Pistek, V. L., Fürst, R. W., Kliem, H., Bauersachs, S., Meyer, H. H. D.,
and Ulbrich, S. E.: HOXA10 mRNA expression and promoter DNA methylation in
female pig offspring after in utero estradiol-17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure, J. Steroid Biochem., 138, 435–444, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Pokkyla, R. M., Lakkakorpi, J. T., Nuojua-Huttunen, S. H., and Tapanainen,
J. S.: Sequence variations in human ZP genes as potential modifiers of zona
pellucida architecture, Fertil. Steril., 95, 2669–2672, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Pollex, T. and Heard, E.: Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation
research, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 24, 825–832, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Rutherford, K., Baxter, E., D'Eath, R., Turner, S., Arnott, G., Roehe, R.,
Ask, B., Sandøe, P., Moustsen, V., and Thorup, F.: The welfare
implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors,
Anim. Welfare, 22, 199–218, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sasaki, H. and Matsui, Y.: Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell
development: reprogramming and beyond, Nat. Rev. Genet., 9, 129–140,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Schubeler, D.: Function and information content of DNA methylation, Nature,
517, 321–326, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, K., Molenaar, A. J., Swanson, K. M., Gudex, B., Arias, J. A., Erdman,
R. A., and Stelwagen, K.: Epigenetics: a possible role in acute and
transgenerational regulation of dairy cow milk production, Animal, 6,
375–381, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, Z. D. and Meissner, A.: DNA methylation: roles in mammalian
development, Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 204–220, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, T. J. and Prendergast, B. J.: Reversible DNA methylation
regulates seasonal photoperiodic time measurement, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 16651–16656, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Su, J., Yan, H., Wei, Y., Liu, H., Liu, H., Wang, F., Lv, J., Wu, Q., and
Zhang, Y.: CpG_MPs: identification of CpG methylation
patterns of genomic regions from high-throughput bisulfite sequencing data,
Nucleic Acids Res., 41, e4,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks829" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nar/gks829</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Varley, K. E., Gertz, J., Bowling, K. M., Parker, S. L., Reddy, T. E.,
Pauli-Behn, F., Cross, M. K., Williams, B. A., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A.,
Crawford, G. E., Absher, D. M., Wold, B. J., and Myers, R. M.: Dynamic DNA
methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues, Genome Res.,
23, 555–567, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Wassarman, P. M.: Zona pellucida glycoproteins, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 24285–24289, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, M., Hellmann, I., Stadler, M. B., Ramos, L., Paabo, S., Rebhan, M.,
and Schubeler, D.: Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact
of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome, Nat. Genet., 39,
457–466, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, Y., Chen, F., Zhang, Q., Zhuang, Y., and Li, Z.: Detection of
differentially methylated regions in whole genome bisulfite sequencing data
using local Getis-Ord statistics, Bioinformatics, 32, 3396–3404, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, M. E., Biensen, N. J., Youngs, C. R., and Ford, S. P.: Development
of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or
Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term, Biol. Reprod., 58, 905–910, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Bao, X., Peng, Z., Wang, L., Du, L., Niu, W., and Sun, Y.:
Comprehensive analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation across human
polycystic ovary syndrome ovary granulosa cell, Oncotarget, 7, 27899–27909,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, Y., Xu, W., Yi, Y. J., Sutovsky, P., and Oko, R.: The extracellular
protein coat of the inner acrosomal membrane is involved in zona pellucida
binding and penetration during fertilization:<?pagebreak page76?> characterization of its most
prominent polypeptide (IAM38), Dev. Biol., 290, 32–43, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Y., Vanhorne, J., and Oko, R.: The origin and assembly of a zona
pellucida binding protein, IAM38, during spermiogenesis, Microsc. Res. Techniq., 72, 558–565, 2009.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, D., Cong, J., Shen, H., Wu, Q., and Wu, X.: Genome-wide
identification of aberrantly methylated promoters in ovarian tissue of
prenatally androgenized rats, Fertil. Steril., 102, 1458–1467, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Hypomethylation in the promoter region of <i>ZPBP</i> as  a potential litter size indicator in Berkshire pigs</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>In pigs, litter size is typically defined as the total number of piglets born
(TNB) or the number of piglets born alive (NBA). Increasing pig litter size
is of great economic interest as a means to increase productivity. The
capacity of the uterus is a critical component of litter size and may play a
central role in prolificacy. In this study, we investigated
litter-size-related epigenetic markers in uterine tissue from Berkshire pigs
with smaller litter size groups (SLGs) and larger litter size groups (LLGs)
using genome-wide bisulfite sequencing (GWBS). A total of 3269 differentially
methylated regions (DMRs) were identified: 1566 were hypermethylated and 1703
hypomethylated in LLG compared to SLG. The zona pellucida binding protein
(<i>ZPBP</i>) gene was significantly hypomethylated in the LLG promoter
region, and its expression was significantly upregulated in uterine tissue.
Thus, the methylation status of <i>ZPBP</i> gene was identified as a
potential indicator of litter size. Furthermore, we verified its negative
correlation with litter size traits (TNB and NBA) in whole blood samples from
172 Berkshire sows as a blood-based biomarker by a porcine
methylation-specific restriction enzyme polymerase chain reaction (PMP)
assay. The results suggest that the methylation status of the <i>ZPBP</i>
gene can serve as a valuable epigenetic biomarker for hyperprolific sows.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abrahamsohn, P. A. and Zorn, T. M.: Implantation and decidualization in
rodents, J. Exp. Zool., 266, 603–628, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Balcells, I., Castello, A., Mercade, A., Noguera, J. L.,
Fernandez-Rodriguez, A., Sanchez, A., and Tomas, A.: Analysis of porcine
MUC4 gene as a candidate gene for prolificacy QTL on SSC13 in an Iberian x
Meishan F2 population, BMC Genet., 12,  1–6,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-93" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-93</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bartol, F. F., Wiley, A. A., and Bagnell, C. A.: Epigenetic programming of
porcine endometrial function and the lactocrine hypothesis, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 43, 273–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01174.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01174.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bell, J. T., Pai, A. A., Pickrell, J. K., Gaffney, D. J., Pique-Regi, R.,
Degner, J. F., Gilad, Y., and Pritchard, J. K.: DNA methylation patterns
associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines,
Genome Biol., 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r10</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Calicchio, R., Doridot, L., Miralles, F., Mehats, C., and Vaiman, D.: DNA
methylation, an epigenetic mode of gene expression regulation in
reproductive science, Curr. Pharm. Design, 20, 1726–1750, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Campbell, E. A., O'Hara, L., Catalano, R. D., Sharkey, A. M., Freeman, T.
C., and Johnson, M. H.: Temporal expression profiling of the uterine luminal
epithelium of the pseudo-pregnant mouse suggests receptivity to the
fertilized egg is associated with complex transcriptional changes, Hum. Reprod., 21, 2495–2513, 2006.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Congras, A., Yerle-Bouissou, M., Pinton, A., Vignoles, F., Liaubet, L.,
Ferchaud, S., and Acloque, H.: Sperm DNA methylation analysis in swine
reveals conserved and species-specific methylation patterns and highlights an
altered methylation at the GNAS locus in infertile boars, Biol. Reprod., 91,
137, 1–14, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Coster, A., Madsen, O., Heuven, H. C., Dibbits, B., Groenen, M. A., van
Arendonk, J. A., and Bovenhuis, H.: The imprinted gene DIO3 is a candidate
gene for litter size in pigs, Plos One, 7, e31825,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031825</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, H., Xiao, S., Li, R., Zhao, F., and Ye, X.: Distinct spatiotemporal
expression of serine proteases Prss23 and Prss35 in periimplantation mouse
uterus and dispensable function of Prss35 in fertility, Plos One, 8, e56757,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056757" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056757</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Distl, O.: Mechanisms of regulation of litter size in pigs on the genome
level, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 42, 10–16, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dube, B., Mulugeta, S. D., and Dzama, K.: Estimation of genetic and
phenotypic parameters for sow productivity traits in South African Large
White pigs, S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 42, 389–397, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Franczak, A., Zglejc, K., Waszkiewicz, E., Wojciechowicz, B., Martyniak, M.,
Sobotka, W., Okrasa, S., and Kotwica, G.: Periconceptional undernutrition
affects in utero methyltransferase expression and steroid hormone concentrations in uterine
flushings and blood plasma during the peri-implantation period in domestic
pigs, Reproduc. Fert. Develop., 29, 1499–1508, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hajkova, P., Erhardt, S., Lane, N., Haaf, T., El-Maarri, O., Reik, W.,
Walter, J., and Surani, M. A.: Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial
germ cells, Mech. Develop., 117, 15–23, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hao, Y., Cui, Y., and Gu, X.: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles changes
associated with constant heat stress in pigs as measured by bisulfite
sequencing, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 27507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27507</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hedstrom, L.: Serine protease mechanism and specificity, Chemical reviews,
102, 4501–4524, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, Y., Xu, H., Li, Z., Zheng, X., Jia, X., Nie, Q., and Zhang, X.:
Comparison of the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles between fast-growing
and slow-growing broilers, Plos One, 8, e56411,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056411</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hwang, J. H., An, S. M., Kwon, S., Park, D. H., Kim, T. W., Kang, D. G., Yu,
G. E., Kim, I. S., Park, H. C., Ha, J., and Kim, C. W.: DNA methylation
patterns and gene expression associated with litter size in Berkshire pig
placenta, Plos One, 12, e0184539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184539</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, L., Jiang, Z., Xia, Y., Lou, P., Chen, L., Wang, H., Bai, L., Xie, Y.,
Liu, Y., Li, W., Zhong, B., Shen, J., Jiang, A., Zhu, L., Wang, J., Li, X.,
and Li, M.: Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in skeletal muscle between
young and middle-aged pigs, BMC Genomics, 15, 653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-653" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-653</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Klose, R. J. and Bird, A. P.: Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its
mediators, Trends Biochem. Sci., 31, 89–97, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ko, Y.-G., Cha, B.-H., Hwang, S., Im, G.-S., Yang, B.-C., Kim, M.-J., Cho,
J.-H., and Seong, H.-H.: Altered DNA Methylation of Repetitive Sequences in
Cloned Porcine Fetus, The Journal of Reproduction and Development Supplement,
578–578, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Krueger, F. and Andrews, S. R.: Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation
caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications, Bioinformatics, 27,
1571–1572, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Kurdyukov, S. and Bullock, M.: DNA Methylation Analysis: Choosing the Right
Method, Biology, 5, 3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biology5010003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/biology5010003</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Lande-Diner, L. and Cedar, H.: Silence of the genes–mechanisms of long-term
repression, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 648–654, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Laurent, L., Wong, E., Li, G., Huynh, T., Tsirigos, A., Ong, C. T., Low, H.
M., Kin Sung, K. W., Rigoutsos, I., Loring, J., and Wei, C. L.: Dynamic
changes in the human methylome during differentiation, Genome Res., 20,
320–331, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Li, E., Beard, C., and Jaenisch, R.: Role for DNA methylation in genomic
imprinting, Nature, 366, 362–365, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G.,
Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q. M., Edsall, L.,
Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Stewart, R., Ruotti, V., Millar, A. H., Thomson, J.
A., Ren, B., and Ecker, J. R.: Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show
widespread epigenomic differences, Nature, 462, 315–322, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lorincz, M. C., Dickerson, D. R., Schmitt, M., and Groudine, M.: Intragenic
DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in
mammalian cells, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 11, 1068–1075,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, W., Niveleau, A., Walter, J., Fundele, R., and Haaf, T.:
Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome, Nature, 403, 501–502, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko,
A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., Gnirke, A.,
Jaenisch, R., and Lander, E. S.: Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of
pluripotent and differentiated cells, Nature, 454, 766–770, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Mesa, H., Safranski, T. J., Johnson, R. K., and Lamberson, W. R.: Correlated
response in placental efficiency in swine selected for an index of
components of lifter size, J. Anim. Sci., 81, 74–79, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Messerschmidt, D. M., Knowles, B. B., and Solter, D.: DNA methylation
dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation
embryos, Gene. Dev., 28, 812–828, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mori, E., Baba, T., Iwamatsu, A., and Mori, T.: Purification and
characterization of a 38-kDa protein, sp38, with zona pellucida-binding
property from porcine epididymal sperm, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Co., 196, 196–202, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mori, E., Kashiwabara, S., Baba, T., Inagaki, Y., and Mori, T.: Amino acid
sequences of porcine Sp38 and proacrosin required for binding to the zona
pellucida, Dev. Biol., 168, 575–583, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Newell-Price, J., Clark, A. J., and King, P.: DNA methylation and silencing
of gene expression, Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 11,
142–148, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Nie, G., Li, Y., and Salamonsen, L. A.: Serine protease HtrA1 is
developmentally regulated in trophoblast and uterine decidual cells during
placental formation in the mouse, Dev. Dynam., 233, 1102–1109, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Nielsen, B., Su, G., Lund, M. S., and Madsen, P.: Selection for increased
number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and
reduced piglet mortality, J. Anim. Sci., 91, 2575–2582, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Pistek, V. L., Fürst, R. W., Kliem, H., Bauersachs, S., Meyer, H. H. D.,
and Ulbrich, S. E.: HOXA10 mRNA expression and promoter DNA methylation in
female pig offspring after in utero estradiol-17<i>β</i> exposure, J. Steroid Biochem., 138, 435–444, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Pokkyla, R. M., Lakkakorpi, J. T., Nuojua-Huttunen, S. H., and Tapanainen,
J. S.: Sequence variations in human ZP genes as potential modifiers of zona
pellucida architecture, Fertil. Steril., 95, 2669–2672, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Pollex, T. and Heard, E.: Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation
research, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 24, 825–832, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Rutherford, K., Baxter, E., D'Eath, R., Turner, S., Arnott, G., Roehe, R.,
Ask, B., Sandøe, P., Moustsen, V., and Thorup, F.: The welfare
implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors,
Anim. Welfare, 22, 199–218, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sasaki, H. and Matsui, Y.: Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell
development: reprogramming and beyond, Nat. Rev. Genet., 9, 129–140,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Schubeler, D.: Function and information content of DNA methylation, Nature,
517, 321–326, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, K., Molenaar, A. J., Swanson, K. M., Gudex, B., Arias, J. A., Erdman,
R. A., and Stelwagen, K.: Epigenetics: a possible role in acute and
transgenerational regulation of dairy cow milk production, Animal, 6,
375–381, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, Z. D. and Meissner, A.: DNA methylation: roles in mammalian
development, Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 204–220, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, T. J. and Prendergast, B. J.: Reversible DNA methylation
regulates seasonal photoperiodic time measurement, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 16651–16656, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Su, J., Yan, H., Wei, Y., Liu, H., Liu, H., Wang, F., Lv, J., Wu, Q., and
Zhang, Y.: CpG_MPs: identification of CpG methylation
patterns of genomic regions from high-throughput bisulfite sequencing data,
Nucleic Acids Res., 41, e4,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks829" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks829</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Varley, K. E., Gertz, J., Bowling, K. M., Parker, S. L., Reddy, T. E.,
Pauli-Behn, F., Cross, M. K., Williams, B. A., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A.,
Crawford, G. E., Absher, D. M., Wold, B. J., and Myers, R. M.: Dynamic DNA
methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues, Genome Res.,
23, 555–567, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Wassarman, P. M.: Zona pellucida glycoproteins, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 24285–24289, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, M., Hellmann, I., Stadler, M. B., Ramos, L., Paabo, S., Rebhan, M.,
and Schubeler, D.: Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact
of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome, Nat. Genet., 39,
457–466, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, Y., Chen, F., Zhang, Q., Zhuang, Y., and Li, Z.: Detection of
differentially methylated regions in whole genome bisulfite sequencing data
using local Getis-Ord statistics, Bioinformatics, 32, 3396–3404, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, M. E., Biensen, N. J., Youngs, C. R., and Ford, S. P.: Development
of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or
Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term, Biol. Reprod., 58, 905–910, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Bao, X., Peng, Z., Wang, L., Du, L., Niu, W., and Sun, Y.:
Comprehensive analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation across human
polycystic ovary syndrome ovary granulosa cell, Oncotarget, 7, 27899–27909,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, Y., Xu, W., Yi, Y. J., Sutovsky, P., and Oko, R.: The extracellular
protein coat of the inner acrosomal membrane is involved in zona pellucida
binding and penetration during fertilization: characterization of its most
prominent polypeptide (IAM38), Dev. Biol., 290, 32–43, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, Y., Vanhorne, J., and Oko, R.: The origin and assembly of a zona
pellucida binding protein, IAM38, during spermiogenesis, Microsc. Res. Techniq., 72, 558–565, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, D., Cong, J., Shen, H., Wu, Q., and Wu, X.: Genome-wide
identification of aberrantly methylated promoters in ovarian tissue of
prenatally androgenized rats, Fertil. Steril., 102, 1458–1467, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
