<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Original study}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AAB</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Archives Animal Breeding</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AAB</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Arch. Anim. Breed.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2363-9822</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/aab-62-305-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep using microsatellite analysis</article-title><alt-title>Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. Dossybayev et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Dossybayev</surname><given-names>Kairat</given-names></name>
          <email>kairat1987_11@mail.ru</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Orazymbetova</surname><given-names>Zarina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mussayeva</surname><given-names>Aizhan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Saitou</surname><given-names>Naruya</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhapbasov</surname><given-names>Rakhymbek</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Makhatov</surname><given-names>Bolathan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Bekmanov</surname><given-names>Bakytzhan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-0481</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Cytogenetics, Institute of
General Genetics <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>and Cytology, Almaty, Kazakhstan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Population Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics,
Mishima, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Faculty of Bioresources and Technology, Kazakh National Agrarian
University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National
University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kairat Dossybayev (kairat1987_11@mail.ru)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>62</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>305</fpage><lpage>312</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Kairat Dossybayev et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/305/2019/aab-62-305-2019.html">This article is available from https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/305/2019/aab-62-305-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/305/2019/aab-62-305-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/305/2019/aab-62-305-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e155">A total of 75 individuals from five sheep populations in Kazakhstan
were investigated based on 12 STR (short tandem repeat, also known as microsatellite) markers in order to study their genetic
structure and phylogenetic relationship based on genetic distances. These
sheep had a high level of genetic diversity. In total, 163 alleles were
found in all the populations using 12 microsatellite loci. The mean
number of alleles, effective number of alleles, and polymorphism information content (PIC) values per loci were
13.4, 5.9, and 0.78, respectively. Comparing the allelic diversity between
the populations, the highest genetic diversity was observed in the Edilbay-1 sheep breed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.333</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.644</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the lowest parameter was for Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.083</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.633</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In all populations, there is a
deficiency of heterozygosity. The largest genetic diversity was found in
loci <italic>INRA023</italic> and <italic>CSRD247</italic> with 16 alleles, and the smallest polymorphism was noted for the
locus <italic>D5S2</italic> with 8 alleles. The level of observed heterozygosity was in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.678</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.051</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.767</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool. The expected heterozygosity level range was from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.702</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Kazakh Arkhar-Merino to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.777</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
Edilbay-1. When 12 microsatellite loci are compared, the <italic>OarFCB20</italic> locus showed the
highest level of genetic variability. Excess of heterozygosity was observed
at three loci; <italic>MAF065</italic>, <italic>McM042</italic>, and <italic>OarFCB20</italic>.
The highest genetic distance was observed between
Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-1, whereas the genetic distance between
Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 is the smallest using Nei's standard genetic
distance. The Edilbay-1 sheep breed possesses the largest genetic diversity
among these five populations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e262">Sheep breeding is the most ancient branch of animal husbandry in Kazakhstan.
The country has more than 20 distinct sheep breeds to date. Among them, the
sheep breeds which first appeared in Kazakhstan by origin and history are
Edilbay, Kazakh Arkhar-Merino, Kazakh Finewool, and Kazakh fat-tailed
coarse wool. These breeds are well adapted to the various climatic
conditions in Kazakhstan. Various breeds of sheep in one way or another are
different in terms of biological efficiency. This study aims at
investigating the genetic diversity of local sheep breeds. The animals
studied belong to purebred and farms' own selection and tribal cards. The
Kazakh Arkhar-Merino sheep breed was investigated on Kumtekey breeding
farm, where the best sheep of this breed are kept. The Kazakh Arkhar-Merino
is based on the interspecific hybridization of wild Arkhar rams with fine wool ewes of Novo-Caucasian Merino, Précoce, and Rambouillet breeds that occurred during 1934–1950. R-Kurty farm is also a breeding farm where the highly
productive animals of the Kazakh Finewool breed are concentrated. Edilbay
sheep breed is bred in Birlik breeding centre, where the purebred and
highly productive sheep of this breed are kept.<?pagebreak page306?> The Kazakh fat-tailed
coarse wool sheep breed is the product of popular selection which has
lasted many years. They are widely bred in many sheep farms all over
Kazakhstan. However, highly productive animals typical of this breed are
concentrated in Kabyl-Nur farm. Thus, four sheep breeds selected by us
for molecular genetic studies are, firstly, the most common sheep breeds in
Kazakhstan, which are well adapted to different climatic conditions of
breeding and housing. Secondly, these breeds differ from each other in their
origin and method of breeding, and thus they are excellent subjects for
comparative molecular genetics research. Thirdly, the specification of
breeding farms from which sheep were studied is extremely important, since
we use the results of the molecular genetics study of these breeds in these
farms to improve breeding work and speed up the selection process in order
to create a highly productive breeding core in a short period of time. Since
research started in 2010, the molecular database has grown, and the
characterization of genetic diversity in farm animals has become particularly
pertinent (Groeneveld et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e265">Today, the FAO and the ISAG–FAO Advisory Group on Animal Genetic Diversity
recommend specific sets of STR (short tandem repeat, also known as microsatellite) loci for genetic analyses, such as for horse,
cattle, and pig breeds. Of the different types of molecular markers, STRs are suitable for studying genetic diversity because of
their abundance – the large amount of allelic variation at each locus is
highly polymorphic, their distribution throughout the genome is random, and inheritance is codominant (Rekha et al., 2016; Barcaccia et al., 2013; Putman
et al., 2014). In addition, STRs are able to generate information for the
planning of crossings and further selection of genotypes in genetic breeding
programs (Faleiro et al., 2007; Crispim et al., 2014). The objective of the
current research was to investigate 12 STR loci based on genetic diversity
in sheep herds as well as the differentiation and relationship among the number of alleles and genetic links between Kazakh sheep breeds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e276">Blood samples were taken from five sheep populations: two of them were
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Edilbay-1<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, though of two various Edilbay-1 sheep herds, and three
others were different sheep breeds in the categories Kazakh Finewool, Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino, and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool. The 15 animals were chosen
randomly from each population. Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial
kit (GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).
Both the quality and concentration of DNA were verified by spectrophotometric
and agarose gel electrophoresis. In this study, 12 STR primers were used, and
all of them are recommended by the International Society of Animal Genetics
(ISAG, 2017). Amplification was carried out using a Tetrad 2
thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were attached in the ABI310 Genetic Analyser, and
GeneMapper software was used to determine fragment size. The number of
alleles, effective number of alleles, polymorphism information content (PIC)
values, observed and expected heterozygosities, Wright's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> statistics per
locus, pairwise population <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and pairwise population
matrix of Nei's standard genetic distance were calculated using GenAlex 6.5
and Excel microsatellite toolkit (version 3.1) software (Peakall and Smouse,
2012; Park 2008). The neighbour joining method of Saitou and Nei (1987) was
used to construct a phylogenetic tree based on Nei's genetic distance in
MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016). Factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) was
investigated based on the individual multi-locus genotype using GENETIX
version 4.03 (Belkhir et al., 1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e309">All examined markers were polymorphic for all the populations examined. In
total, 161 alleles were found in five native Kazakh sheep breeds based on
12 STR loci (Table 1). The highest number of alleles was 16 for markers
<italic>INRA023</italic> and <italic>CSRD247</italic>, whereas <italic>D5S2</italic> showed the
lowest number (8 alleles), and the average number
of alleles was 13.4 per locus.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e324">Genetic diversity analysis of sheep populations based on the 12
microsatellite markers. Number of alleles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), effective number of alleles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), observed heterozygosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), expected heterozygosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
polymorphism information content (PIC), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> statistics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">it</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Locus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PIC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">it</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>CSRD247</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.862</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.720</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.873</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8566</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.131</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.051</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>D5S2</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.654</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.667</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.726</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6966</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.032</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.082</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.052</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>INRA005</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.263</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.787</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.862</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8376</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.041</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.088</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.049</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>INRA006</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.257</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.520</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.765</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7194</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.320</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.117</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>INRA023</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.813</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.889</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8654</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.022</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.085</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.064</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>INRA63</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.152</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.840</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.877</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8535</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.030</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.070</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>INRA172</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.733</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.573</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.732</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.157</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.071</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>MAF065</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.643</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.813</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.785</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7547</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.072</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.037</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.033</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>MAF214</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.568</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.653</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.781</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7318</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.164</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.103</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>McM042</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.733</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.689</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6496</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.115</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.064</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.045</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>McM527</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.890</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.773</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.830</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8054</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.069</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.075</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>OarFCB20</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.131</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.893</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.890</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8766</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.097</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.085</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.416</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.948</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.732</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.808</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.030</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.095</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.068</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1018">The effective number of alleles for each marker varied between 3.2 and 9.1,
with a mean value of 5.9. The PIC values ranged from 0.65 to 0.88, with a
mean of 0.78. Observed heterozygosity values varied from 0.52 to 0.89, with
an average of 0.73, while the expected heterozygosity values ranged from 0.69
to 0.89 with a mean value of 0.81 (Table 1). Our study demonstrated a high
genetic polymorphism in the investigated sheep breeds. These estimates are
higher than those reported for other sheep breeds (Ferrando et al., 2014, in
France and Spain; Salamon et al., 2014, in Croatia and Bosnia and
Herzegovina; Al-Atiyat et al., 2015, in
Australia; Gaouar et al., 2016, in Morocco).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1025">Genetic diversity within the five sheep populations. Mean number of
alleles (MNA), effective number of alleles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), observed heterozygosity
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and expected heterozygosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Population</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MNA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kazakh Arkhar-Merino</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.083</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.633</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.902</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.477</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.678</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.051</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.702</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kazakh Finewool</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.917</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.557</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.900</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.538</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.744</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.048</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.770</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.022</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Edilbay-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.333</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.644</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.975</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.461</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.739</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.052</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.777</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Edilbay-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.583</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.417</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.343</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.373</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.733</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.034</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.750</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.022</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.417</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.609</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.921</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.524</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.767</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.768</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.667</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.256</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.608</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.214</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.732</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.753</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1507">The average number of alleles, the effective number of alleles, and the expected and observed heterozygosity for each breed are shown in Table 2. The average
number of alleles for the Edilbay-1 breed is 8.33. This analysis showed that
there was no significant differentiation among the groups from the following
populations: Kazakh Arkhar-Merino (7.08), Kazakh Finewool (7.91), Edilbay-2
(7.58), and Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool (7.41). With the exception of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kazakh Arkhar-Merino sheep, the effective number of alleles was
larger than 4.0. In this study, the average value of observed heterozygosity
was 0.68 for the Kazakh Arkhar-Merino population, and similar results were
reported for Chinese and Mongolian breeds (Zhong et al., 2011). It is important to
note that this is lower compared to the other four investigated sheep populations. At
the same time, the expected heterozygosity value was more than 0.7 for all
sheep groups. Values of the comparable means have been reported by Yilmaz et
al. (2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1527">The phylogenetic tree constructed from Nei's standard genetic
distances among five sheep populations.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/305/2019/aab-62-305-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page307?><p id="d1e1536"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was observed in marker <italic>INRA006</italic>, while the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was recorded for locus <italic>McM527</italic>. The maximum and minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">it</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were
found in markers <italic>INRA006</italic> and <italic>OarFCB20</italic> respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged from 0.117 to
0.033, and the average values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">it</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.030,
0.095, and 0.068 accordingly. According to the observed results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
related mating occurs within each studied breed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Obtained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values showed that the degree of genetic divergence is
moderate between the sheep populations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">it</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was higher than zero, which indicates deficiency of
heterozygosity. The highest genetic distance was found between Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-1 (0.469), while the smallest genetic distance was
observed between Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 (0.217). Pairwise values of genetic
differentiation,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, varied from 0.030 to 0.063.</p>
      <p id="d1e1709">The neighbour joining tree for all samples was constructed using pairwise
population matrix of Nei's genetic distances in order to represent the
relationships between the sheep breeds (Fig. 1). Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2
were initially classified as sub-clusters, which were further clustered into
Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool, whereas Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Kazakh Finewool sheep breeds were grouped around the same node. Moreover, in the
factorial correspondence analysis, the distinction of three clusters is
illustrated by three axes showing variances of 37.93 %, 24.35 %, and
22.49 %, respectively (Fig. 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1715">The factorial correspondence analysis of five sheep populations
studied on the bases of 12 STR loci.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/62/305/2019/aab-62-305-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page308?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1732">In this study, 12 STR (microsatellite) markers were used to evaluate genetic
diversity in five populations. The analysis revealed no significant
differences in the main genetic characteristics of the interbred population:
number of alleles, effective number of alleles, and expected and observed
heterozygosities. A high level of genetic diversity was observed in loci
<italic>INRA023</italic> and <italic>CSRD247</italic>, with a large number of alleles. According to Ozerov et al. (2008),
the Edilbay sheep breed had the highest genetic diversity among the populations
studied. Similarly, our analysis of the data showed that the greatest
genetic diversity was detected in the Edilbay-1 sheep breed, with a mean value of
alleles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.333</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.644</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and these indicators did not differ much among
the remaining populations (Table 2). The allele diversity for Edilbay-1 was
similar to that of Arabian sheep studied with 12 microsatellite loci (Ahmed
et al., 2018) but much higher than that reported for Jordan sheep breeds
(Khaleel   et al., 2018). The lowest genetic diversity among the breeds
studied was expressed in Kazakh Arkhar-Merino, with an average value of seven alleles. The obtained allele diversity for Kazakh Arkhar-Merino was higher
than the other studies (Sadeghi, 2018 and Khaleel et al., 2018), and this
indicator is close to that described for the Algerian breeds (Gaouar et al., 2015).
Moreover, in the present study the highest effective number of alleles was found for Edilbay-1(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), similar to values reported for
Nellore sheep (Vani et al., 2017). The reason why the Edilbay-1 sheep breed
maintains high genetic diversity is that currently in Birlik breeding
centre there are 16 512 breeding sheep of the Edilbay breed, including 7500
ewes. In addition, farmers raise the sheep in different flocks by dividing
them into three different groups according to the colour of their wool.
Researchers have shown that animals with different colour wool are
characterized by unequal productivity. For example, it has been proven
that ewes with black wool have a higher wool yield by 7.5 %–11.8 %, a higher live weight by 2.2 %–6.9 %, and better slaughter qualities than sheep
with red wool. The sheep with brown wool are characterized by the same high
productivity indices. The fertility of females is not higher than
110 %–120 %. The milk content of the sheep is quite high. Furthermore,
during the season of breeding, breeders exchange rams among flocks to
maintain the genetic diversity.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1771">Pairwise population matrix of Nei's genetic distances (above the
diagonal) and pairwise population <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Values (below the
diagonal).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kazakh Arkhar-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kazakh Finewool</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Edilbay-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Edilbay-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Kazakh fat-tailed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Merino</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">coarse wool</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kazakh Arkhar-Merino</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.259</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.469</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.406</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.403</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kazakh Finewool</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.040</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.401</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.299</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.242</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Edilbay-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.063</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.046</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.328</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Edilbay-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.059</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.039</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.030</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.222</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.057</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.031</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.039</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.030</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1958">The overall average of <italic>PIC</italic> value for the five populations was equal to 0.78, and all
the markers were higher than 0.5, which means all the investigated STR
loci were highly informative. This value was higher than that reported for
Chinese sheep (PIC of 0.64; Guang-Xin et al., 2016). Also, PIC values showed that
the most informative markers were <italic>OarFCB20 </italic>and <italic>INRA023</italic>. However, PIC values were lower
than heterozygosities. According to Botstein et al. (1980), PIC must be
always less than the expected heterozygosity. Aside from Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino, in all examined populations, the average PIC value had a
similar ranking. Consequently,<?pagebreak page309?> these markers are suitable for studying the
genetic diversity in Kazakh sheep breeds.</p>
      <p id="d1e1971">The fixation index was estimated on a per locus basis, and due to negative
assortative mating, an excess of heterozygosity was found at markers
<italic>MAF065</italic>, <italic>McM042</italic>, and <italic>OarFCB20.</italic></p>
      <p id="d1e1982">In addition, to estimate the genetic variability of the studied sheep
breeds, we calculated the expected and observed heterozygosity values.
Except for <italic>MAF065</italic> and <italic>McM042</italic>, in all loci the level of observed heterozygosity was lower
than expected heterozygosity; therefore there were more homozygous individuals in the investigated flocks. As well as the mean expected
heterozygosity in each population being higher than that of the
heterozygotes, our results showed that heterozygotic deficiency was noted in
all populations. Compared to the average heterozygosity value in the
population, the observed heterozygotes fluctuated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.678</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.051</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Kazakh Arkhar-Merino) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.767</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kazakh fat-tailed
coarse wool), while the expected heterozygotes ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.702</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kazakh Arkhar-Merino) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.777</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Edilbay-1). Meanwhile,
the overall average values for this population were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.732</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.753</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2). These findings were similar to those reported
in the literature (Sassi-Zaidy et al., 2014). The genetic variability
obtained in these studies was similar to the results reached by Ozerov et
al. (2008). By contrast, the level of genetic variability of the Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino sheep breed is lower than those of Edilbay and Kazakh Finewool. In spite of this, this indicator of Kazakh Arkhar-Merino was still
higher than those of some native Chinese sheep breeds (Guang-Xin et al.,
2016) as well as eastern Adriatic and western Dinaric native sheep breeds
(Salamon et al., 2014). The average mean of the observed heterozygosity was
less than the mean of expected heterozygosity in the whole population; this
could be due to selection against heterozygosity or inbreeding (Abdullah et
al., 2013; Carmen et al., 2007). Thus, according to the comparison results
of the investigated populations, the genetic variability in the Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino population was identified as being lower than in the others.</p>
      <p id="d1e2064">Previously, a study was conducted by Ozerov et al. (2008) on four sheep
breeds of Kazakhstan (Degeres Mutton-wool, Kazakh Arkhar-Merino, Kazakh Finewool, and Edilbaev) using 20 microsatellite loci. As a result, it was
determined that all studied sheep breeds showed a high level of polymorphism
in all 20 microsatellite loci and were in a state of genetic equilibrium according to the Hardy–Weinberg ratio. However, in our studies of the Kazakh Arkhar-Merino
sheep breed, there were significant differences between the expected and
observed heterozygosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.678</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.702</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In Ozerov (2008) et
al., this index was in equilibrium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This means
that in the Kazakh Arkhar-Merino sheep breed population there is a deficiency
of heterozygotes. This fact evidences that the degree of inbreeding of the Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino sheep breed is quite high. In the current conditions of animal
breeding, when private farm sheep breeding is widely practised in the
country, breeding farms for one breed each have a small number of animals.
Therefore, they practically do not exchange tribal animals among themselves.
However, with a closed breeding system, inbreeding sooner or later reaches a
dangerous level and leads to inbreeding depression (decreased productivity and reproductive qualities) and, finally, degeneration. Consequently, it is
necessary to strive to limit inbreeding in conserved breeds and gene pool
herds. The same situation exists for sheep of the Kazakh Arkhar-Merino
breed from Kumtekey breeding farm. Based on the obtained genetic
information on a high degree of inbreeding, animals from this farm will
develop special breeding measures to preserve the valuable interspecific
gene pool of animals of this unique breed and their rational use. We gave
recommendations to Kumtekey breeding farm to reduce inbreeding
urgently while maximizing the number of males used and reducing the number
of lines with the highest intensity of interlinear pairing.</p>
      <p id="d1e2127">Furthermore, in order to analyse population differentiation and structure, Wright's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> statistics of three indices for the overall
population were used for each locus (Wright, 1965). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">is</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fixation coefficient of an
individual within a subpopulation, shows a loss of heterozygosity in loci
excluding <italic>INRA63</italic>, <italic>MAF065</italic>, <italic>McM042</italic>, <italic>McM527</italic>,
and <italic>OarFCB20</italic>. The values of the inbreeding coefficient of an individual within the
total population, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">it</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranged from 0.320 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The fixation coefficient of the subpopulation within the whole population,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicates reduction of heterozygosity due to a limit of gene flow and
genetic drift among the subpopulation. This result indicates a moderate
degree of genetic divergence among subpopulations or breeds of
6.8 % overall. At<?pagebreak page310?> the same time, the degree of genetic divergence of a
subpopulation within the total population amounted to 93.2 %. A similar
result was found by Gaouar et al. (2014), (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), who
studied the genetic admixture of North African ovine breeds based on six STR loci
(Gaouar et al., 2014). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was considerably higher than both
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values previously reported by Ozerov et al. (2008) and that
of Algerian sheep breeds (Gaouar et al., 2015; Abdelkader et  al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e2234">In the present study, we used pairwise population <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to provide
a measure of the genetic differentiation among sheep breeds (Table 3). The proportion
of genetic divergence indicated that moderate differentiation was
observed between Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-1 (0.063), Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-2 (0.059), and Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Kazakh
fat-tailed coarse wool (0.057), with a mean of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These obtained differentiation parameters are generally comparable
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the fat-tailed Barbarine sheep breed (Sassi-Zaidy et
al., 2014). The other investigated sheep population for pairwise genetic
differentiation parameters showed values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, according
to Hartl (1980), indicates a low differentiation among the population.
Further, significant genetic differentiation observed ranged from 0.031
to 0.046. Mahmoud et al. (2017) also found significant differentiation
between Sawakni, Berberi, and Najdi sheep breeds. However, the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficient is found between Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 since
Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 are classified as one breed. In order to enhance
breed character and to attempt an increase in the status of Edilbay-2, the
farmers are buying males from the Edilbay-1 breed, for the reason that the Edilbay-1
breed is a livestock breeding farm with the best quality in Kazakhstan.
Consequently, it is clear that  migration is going on here. Migration has
a great effect on the reduction of genetic differentiation among the population (Laval et al., 2000).</p>
      <p id="d1e2298">Nei's genetic distances (Nei, 1972) between the five populations of sheep
were calculated using 12 STR loci (Table 3), which varied from 0.469 to 0.217. The
results of genetic distance of the present study were lower than the
findings of Bai et al. (2015), who reported that the genetic distance
ranged from 0.21 to 0.62 for Chinese indigenous sheep breeds, which was
higher than that of Egyptian sheep breeds (Rushdi et al., 2015). The values
of genetic distances showed that the investigated sheep populations are
characterized as having a high range of variability of the allele pool,
presence or absence of certain alleles, and differences in frequency of
occurrence alleles. The largest genetic distance was observed between Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-1 (0.469). These two breeds were absolutely different
from each other originally: by phenotype, according to the different branches
of stock breeding and geographical places. Kazakh Arkhar-Merino is a meat-woolly breed with fine wool. Kazakh Arkhar-Merino is well adapted to breeding at
high altitudes, and these sheep differ favourably from other breeds in
conditions of mountain pasture. In contrast, the Edilbay-1 sheep breed
is classified as the coarse wool sheep from the meat-fatty category. They are
well adapted to the severe desert and semi-desert conditions of Kazakhstan.
Also, Kazakh Arkhar-Merino is geographically most distant from Edilbay-1. In
comparison with other populations, a closer relationship was found between
Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Kazakh Finewool (0.25), which could be attributed
to the low geographical distance between these two populations. The same result
has been found between Kermani and Lori-Bakhtiari Pakistani sheep (0.25),
which both breed in Iran (Vajed Ebrahimi  et al., 2017). Both of them
(Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Kazakh Finewool) refer to the meat and wool types
of sheep breeds. Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool and Edilbay-2 had less similarity to the Kazakh Finewool than Edilbay-1.</p>
      <p id="d1e2302">Further, to assess the genetic relationships among the population, a
phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour joining method
(Saitou and Nei, 1987) based on Nei's genetic distance. The results of
the phylogenetic tree indicated that the Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 sheep breeds
were clustered into Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool, which are coarse wool
breeds and have a common origin. However, Kazakh Finewool and Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino were grouped in the same node, both being fine wool sheep,
as these breeds have the same ancestral background. Likewise, these two
breeds were categorized together on the same branch of the phylogenetic tree
in the previous study (Ozerov et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e2305">In addition, factorial correspondence analysis demonstrated that Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino and Kazakh Finewool were isolated from the other
studied populations due to the high level of differentiation and no sharing of alleles. Edilbay-2 is an admixture of both Edilbay-1 and Kazakh
fat-tailed coarse wool. According to the FCA findings, this is connected with
historical origin of these Kazakh sheep breeds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2317">In this study, within and among herds, the genetic diversity of five Kazakh
sheep populations was assessed using 12 microsatellite markers. Based on our
results, all five populations examined show high genetic diversity through a high effective number of alleles, a large mean number of alleles, high PIC values, and 12 completely polymorphic tested microsatellites. Moderate
differentiation was found between Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-1,
whereas differentiation between Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 was lower. Therefore,
the evaluation of the results of Nei's genetic distance, neighbour joining, and FCA agreed with the historical origin of animals. As our study showed, although
10 years have passed since the research by Ozerov et al. (2008), it has
been discovered that genetic diversity remains in sheep breeds other than Kazakh Arkhar-Merino. The main reasons for this fact are as follows.
Scientists and livestock breeders have always been working on the
improvement of these breeds. The<?pagebreak page311?> advantages of this research also include
the ability of the breeds to transmit all useful economic traits to their
offspring. Breeding work is carried out mainly along the lines using several
herds. Of course, not only the best males, but also elite queens, are
selected to replenish livestock. Lines of sheep are created according to
some outstanding qualities – precocity, weight, size of fat tail, and quality
of wool. The work consists mainly of mating animals with distant degrees of
kinship in the line. In addition, based on the data obtained, it is possible
to recommend the Kazakh Arkhar-Merino breed for the selection against
homozygous individuals. Further, the results achieved on STR loci are proposed to be
used to control and conserve the genetic diversity of native sheep breeds.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2324">The materials used the current study are available from the
corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2330">KD
and ZO participated in the collection of all
materials and conducted all the experiments. KD and AM wrote the
paper. RZh, BB, NS, and BM participated in the editing of the paper.
All authors read and approved the final paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2336">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2342">The protocol for the use of materials was agreed with the
Commission on Bioethics of the Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty,
Kazakhstan.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2348">The authors thank Gulnur Zhunussova for helping in all experiments
and for technical support.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2353">This research has been supported by the
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant no. 541).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2359">This paper was edited by Steffen Maak and reviewed by Semir Bechir Suheil Gaouar and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abdelkader, A. A., Ata, N., Benyoucef, M. T., Djaout, A.,
Azzi, N., Yilmaz, O., Cemal, I., and Gaouar, S. B. S.: Newgenetic identification and characterisation of 12
Algerian sheep breeds by microsatellite markers, Ital. J. Anim.
Sci., 1, 38–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1335182" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/1828051X.2017.1335182</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Abdullah, G., Samir, M., Manal, E., Ashraf, A., Mohamd, E., Keiichiro, K., and Kazuyoshi,
H.: Genetic diversity and distances of three Egyptian local sheep
breeds using microsatellite markers, Research in Zoology, 3, 1–9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.778-781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.14202/vetworld.2018.778-781</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmed, H. M., Faisal, M. A., Ahmed, R., Khalid, M. A., Mohammad, A. F., and
Osama, B. M.: Genetic variability of sheep populations of Saudi Arabia using
microsatellite markers, Indian J. Anim. Res., 775, 1–4, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Al-Atiyat, R. M.: The
power of 28 microsatellite markers for parentage testing in sheep, Electron.
J. Biotechn., 18, 116–121, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bai, J. Y., Yang, Y. B., Wang, Y. Q., Zhang, X. H., and Pang, Y. Z.:
Polymorphism analysis of three Chinese indigenous sheep breeds by
microsatellite markers, Indian J. Anim. Res., 49, 585–590,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.5566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18805/ijar.5566</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Barcaccia, G., Felicetti, M., Galla, G., Capomaccio, S., Cappelli, K., Albertini, E., Buttazzoni, L.,
Pieramati, C., Silvestrelli, M., and Supplizi, A. V.: Molecular analysis of genetic diversity
population structure and inbreeding level of the Italian Lipizzan horse,
Livest Sci., 151, 124–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.11.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.livsci.2012.11.022</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Goudet, J., Chikhi, L., and Bonhomme, F.: GENETIX
4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations, in:
Laboratoire Génome Populations, Interactions CNRS UMR 5000,
Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Botstein, D., White, R. L., Skolnick, M., and Davis, R. W.: Construction of a
genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms,
Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32, 314–331, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Carmen, M.: Genetic characterization of indigenous goat populations of
Mozambique, Master thesis, Department of Production Animal Studies in Faculty
of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Crispim, B. A., Seno, L. O., Egito, A. A., Junior, F. M. V., and Grisolia, A.
B.: Application of microsatellite markers for breeding and genetic
conservation of herds of Pantaneiro sheep, Electron. J. Biotechn., 17,
317–321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Faleiro, F. G.: Marcadores genético-moleculares aplicados a programas de
conser-vação e uso de recursos genéticos, Planaltina-DF, Embrapa
Cerrados, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ferrando, A., Goyache, F., Parés, P. M., Carrión, C., Miró, J.,
and Jordana, J.: Genetic relationships between six eastern Pyrenean sheep
breeds assessed using microsatellites, Span. J. Agric. Res., 12, 1029–1037,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5424/sjar/2014124-6173</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gaouar, S. B. S., Kdidi, S., Tabet Aouel, N., Aït-Yahia, R., Boushaba, N., Aouissat, M., Dhimi, L.,
Yahyaoui, M. H., and Saidi-Mehtar, N.: Genetic admixture of North-African
ovine breeds as revealed by microsatellite loci, Livest. Res. Rural. Dev.,
26, 1–11, <uri>http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/7/gaou26118.htm</uri>(last access: 25 Mat 2019), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gaouar, S. B. S., Da Silva, A., Ciani, E., Kdidi, S., Aouissat, M., Dhimi, L.,
Lafri, M., Maftah, A., and Mehtar,  N.: Admixture and local breed marginalization threaten
Algerian sheep diversity, PLoS ONE, 10, e0122667,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0122667</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gaouar, S. B. S., Kdidi, S., and Ouragh, L.: Estimating population structure
and genetic diversity of five Moroccan sheep breeds by microsatellite
markers, Small Ruminant. Res., 144, 23–27, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Groeneveld, L. F., Lenstra, J. A., Eding, H., Toro, M. A., Scherf,<?pagebreak page312?> B., Pilling, D.,
Negrini, R., Finlay, E. K., Jianlin, H., Groeneveld, E., and Weigend, S.: Genetic diversity in farm animals – a
review, Anim. Genet., 41, 1–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Guang-Xin, E., Tao, Z., Yue-Hui, M., Hui-Jiang, G., Jian-Ning, H., and Nan,
L.: Conservation genetics in Chinese sheep: diversity of fourteen indigenous
sheep (<italic>Ovis aries</italic>) using microsatellite markers, Ecol. Evol., 6,
810–817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ece3.1891</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hartl, D.: Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer
Association Inc, Massachusset, USA, 164–165, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>ISAG: 36th International Society for Animal Genetics Conference, 16–21 July,
Dublin, Ireland, available at:
<uri>https://www.isag.us/Docs/AppGenSheepGoat2017.pdf</uri> (last access: 28 May 2019), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Khaleel, I. J., Mustafa, M. A., Zuhair, B. I., Abdel, M. B. Y., and Ibrahem,
A. S.: Genetic diversity and population structure of local and exotic sheep
breeds in Jordan using microsatellites markers, Veterinary World, 11,
778–781, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K.: MEGA7: molecular evolutionary
genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33,
1870–1874, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/molbev/msw054</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Laval, G., Iannuccelli, N., Legault, C., Milan, D., Groenen, M. A., Giuffra,
E., Andersson, L., Nissen, P. H., Jørgensen, C. B., Beeckmann, P.,
Geldermann, H., Foulley, J. L., Chevalet, C., and Ollivier, L.: Genetic
diversity of eleven European pig breeds, Genet. Sel. Evol., 32, 187–203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2000113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/gse:2000113</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Mahmoud, A. H., Swelum, A., Farah, M. A., Alanazi, K., Rady, A., Salah, M.,
Amor, N., and Mohammed, O. B.: Genetic diversity among Sawakni, Berberi and
Najdi sheep breeds in Saudi Arabia using microsatellites markers, Afr. J.
Biotechnol., 16, 171–178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5897/AJB2016.15785</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Nei, M.: Genetic distance between populations, Am. Nat., 106, 283–292, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ozerov, M. Y., Marzanov, N. S., Tapio, M., Burabaev, A. A., Marzanova, L. K.,
Amerkhanov, K. A., and Kantanen, Yu: Genetic features of Kazakh sheep breeds
according to microsatellites, Russian Agricultural Sciences, 34, 45–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367408010175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3103/S1068367408010175</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Park, S. D. E.: The Excel microsatellite Toolkit (version 3.1), Animal
Genomics Laboratory, University College, Dublin, Ireland, 2001, available at:
<uri>http://animalgenomics.ucd.ie/sdepark/ms-toolkit/</uri>, last access: April
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Peakall, R. and Smouse, P.: GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel.
Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update,
Bioinformatics, 28, 2537–2539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Putman, A. I. and Carbone, I.: Challenges in analysis and interpretation of
microsatellite data for population genetic studies, Ecol. Evol., 4,
4399–428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ece3.1305</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Rekha, S., Brijesh, K., Reena, A., Sonika, A., Mishra, A. K., and Tantia, M.
S.: Genetic diversity estimates point to immediate efforts for conserving the
endangered Tibetan sheep of India, Meta Gene, 8, 14–20,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2016.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.mgene.2016.01.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Rushdi, H. E. and Sabry, A. M.: Analysis of the genetic diversity of three
Egyptian sheep breeds using microsatellite markers, International Journal of
Advanced Research, 3, 112–120, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Sadeghi, B.: Genetic Diversity of Tandureh Mouflon Population, Acta Vet.
Eurasia, 44, 20–25, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Saitou, N. and Nei, M.: The neighbor-joining method: A new method for
reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406–425,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Salamon, D., Gutierrez-Gil, B., Arranz, J. J., Barreta, J., Batinic, V., and
Dzidic, A.: Genetic diversity and differentiation of 12 eastern Adriatic and
western Dinaric native sheep breeds using microsatellites, Animal, 8,
200–207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113002243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S1751731113002243</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sassi-Zaidy, Y. B., Maretto, F., Zanetti, E., Hajji, G. M.,
Charfi-Cheikrouha, F., and Cassandro, M.: Genetic structure and variability
within and among populations of the fat-tailed Barbarine sheep breed using
microsatellites markers, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 13, 44–54,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5897/AJB2013.13363</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Vajed Ebrahimi, M. T., Mohammadabadi, M., and Esmailizadeh, A.: Using
microsatellite markers to analyze genetic diversity in 14 sheep types in
Iran, Arch. Anim. Breed., 60, 183–189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-183-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/aab-60-183-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Vani, S.,  Punyakumari, B.,  Gnanaprakash, M., and  Rao, V. H.: Microsatellite marker
analysis in Nellore breed of sheep, International Journal of Science,
Environment and Technology, 6, 702–707, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Wright, S.: The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with
special regard to systems of mating, Evolution, 19, 395–420,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01731.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01731.x</ext-link>, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Yilmaz, O., Cemal, I., and Karaca, O.: Genetic diversity in nine native
Turkish sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis, Ani. Genet., 45,
604–608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/age.12173</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, T., Han, J. L., Guo, J., Zhao, Q. J., Fu, B. L., Pu, Y. B., He, X. H.,
Jeon, J. T., Guan, W. J., and Ma Y. H.: Tracing genetic differentiation of
Chinese Mongolian sheep using microsatellites, Anim. Genet., 42, 563–565,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02181.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02181.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep using microsatellite analysis</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A total of 75 individuals from five sheep populations in Kazakhstan
were investigated based on 12 STR (short tandem repeat, also known as microsatellite) markers in order to study their genetic
structure and phylogenetic relationship based on genetic distances. These
sheep had a high level of genetic diversity. In total, 163 alleles were
found in all the populations using 12 microsatellite loci. The mean
number of alleles, effective number of alleles, and polymorphism information content (PIC) values per loci were
13.4, 5.9, and 0.78, respectively. Comparing the allelic diversity between
the populations, the highest genetic diversity was observed in the Edilbay-1 sheep breed (8.333±0.644), and the lowest parameter was for Kazakh
Arkhar-Merino (7.083±0.633). In all populations, there is a
deficiency of heterozygosity. The largest genetic diversity was found in
loci <i>INRA023</i> and <i>CSRD247</i> with 16 alleles, and the smallest polymorphism was noted for the
locus <i>D5S2</i> with 8 alleles. The level of observed heterozygosity was in the range 0.678±0.051 for Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and 0.767±0.047 for
Kazakh fat-tailed coarse wool. The expected heterozygosity level range was from
0.702±0.033 for Kazakh Arkhar-Merino to 0.777±0.023 for
Edilbay-1. When 12 microsatellite loci are compared, the <i>OarFCB20</i> locus showed the
highest level of genetic variability. Excess of heterozygosity was observed
at three loci; <i>MAF065</i>, <i>McM042</i>, and <i>OarFCB20</i>.
The highest genetic distance was observed between
Kazakh Arkhar-Merino and Edilbay-1, whereas the genetic distance between
Edilbay-1 and Edilbay-2 is the smallest using Nei's standard genetic
distance. The Edilbay-1 sheep breed possesses the largest genetic diversity
among these five populations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdelkader, A. A., Ata, N., Benyoucef, M. T., Djaout, A.,
Azzi, N., Yilmaz, O., Cemal, I., and Gaouar, S. B. S.: Newgenetic identification and characterisation of 12
Algerian sheep breeds by microsatellite markers, Ital. J. Anim.
Sci., 1, 38–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1335182" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1335182</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Abdullah, G., Samir, M., Manal, E., Ashraf, A., Mohamd, E., Keiichiro, K., and Kazuyoshi,
H.: Genetic diversity and distances of three Egyptian local sheep
breeds using microsatellite markers, Research in Zoology, 3, 1–9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.778-781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.778-781</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmed, H. M., Faisal, M. A., Ahmed, R., Khalid, M. A., Mohammad, A. F., and
Osama, B. M.: Genetic variability of sheep populations of Saudi Arabia using
microsatellite markers, Indian J. Anim. Res., 775, 1–4, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Al-Atiyat, R. M.: The
power of 28 microsatellite markers for parentage testing in sheep, Electron.
J. Biotechn., 18, 116–121, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bai, J. Y., Yang, Y. B., Wang, Y. Q., Zhang, X. H., and Pang, Y. Z.:
Polymorphism analysis of three Chinese indigenous sheep breeds by
microsatellite markers, Indian J. Anim. Res., 49, 585–590,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.5566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.5566</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barcaccia, G., Felicetti, M., Galla, G., Capomaccio, S., Cappelli, K., Albertini, E., Buttazzoni, L.,
Pieramati, C., Silvestrelli, M., and Supplizi, A. V.: Molecular analysis of genetic diversity
population structure and inbreeding level of the Italian Lipizzan horse,
Livest Sci., 151, 124–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.11.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.11.022</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Goudet, J., Chikhi, L., and Bonhomme, F.: GENETIX
4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations, in:
Laboratoire Génome Populations, Interactions CNRS UMR 5000,
Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Botstein, D., White, R. L., Skolnick, M., and Davis, R. W.: Construction of a
genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms,
Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32, 314–331, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Carmen, M.: Genetic characterization of indigenous goat populations of
Mozambique, Master thesis, Department of Production Animal Studies in Faculty
of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Crispim, B. A., Seno, L. O., Egito, A. A., Junior, F. M. V., and Grisolia, A.
B.: Application of microsatellite markers for breeding and genetic
conservation of herds of Pantaneiro sheep, Electron. J. Biotechn., 17,
317–321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Faleiro, F. G.: Marcadores genético-moleculares aplicados a programas de
conser-vação e uso de recursos genéticos, Planaltina-DF, Embrapa
Cerrados, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrando, A., Goyache, F., Parés, P. M., Carrión, C., Miró, J.,
and Jordana, J.: Genetic relationships between six eastern Pyrenean sheep
breeds assessed using microsatellites, Span. J. Agric. Res., 12, 1029–1037,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6173</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gaouar, S. B. S., Kdidi, S., Tabet Aouel, N., Aït-Yahia, R., Boushaba, N., Aouissat, M., Dhimi, L.,
Yahyaoui, M. H., and Saidi-Mehtar, N.: Genetic admixture of North-African
ovine breeds as revealed by microsatellite loci, Livest. Res. Rural. Dev.,
26, 1–11, <a href="http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/7/gaou26118.htm" target="_blank">http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/7/gaou26118.htm</a>(last access: 25 Mat 2019), 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gaouar, S. B. S., Da Silva, A., Ciani, E., Kdidi, S., Aouissat, M., Dhimi, L.,
Lafri, M., Maftah, A., and Mehtar,  N.: Admixture and local breed marginalization threaten
Algerian sheep diversity, PLoS ONE, 10, e0122667,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122667</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gaouar, S. B. S., Kdidi, S., and Ouragh, L.: Estimating population structure
and genetic diversity of five Moroccan sheep breeds by microsatellite
markers, Small Ruminant. Res., 144, 23–27, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Groeneveld, L. F., Lenstra, J. A., Eding, H., Toro, M. A., Scherf, B., Pilling, D.,
Negrini, R., Finlay, E. K., Jianlin, H., Groeneveld, E., and Weigend, S.: Genetic diversity in farm animals – a
review, Anim. Genet., 41, 1–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Guang-Xin, E., Tao, Z., Yue-Hui, M., Hui-Jiang, G., Jian-Ning, H., and Nan,
L.: Conservation genetics in Chinese sheep: diversity of fourteen indigenous
sheep (<i>Ovis aries</i>) using microsatellite markers, Ecol. Evol., 6,
810–817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1891</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hartl, D.: Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer
Association Inc, Massachusset, USA, 164–165, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
ISAG: 36th International Society for Animal Genetics Conference, 16–21 July,
Dublin, Ireland, available at:
<a href="https://www.isag.us/Docs/AppGenSheepGoat2017.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.isag.us/Docs/AppGenSheepGoat2017.pdf</a> (last access: 28 May 2019), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Khaleel, I. J., Mustafa, M. A., Zuhair, B. I., Abdel, M. B. Y., and Ibrahem,
A. S.: Genetic diversity and population structure of local and exotic sheep
breeds in Jordan using microsatellites markers, Veterinary World, 11,
778–781, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K.: MEGA7: molecular evolutionary
genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33,
1870–1874, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Laval, G., Iannuccelli, N., Legault, C., Milan, D., Groenen, M. A., Giuffra,
E., Andersson, L., Nissen, P. H., Jørgensen, C. B., Beeckmann, P.,
Geldermann, H., Foulley, J. L., Chevalet, C., and Ollivier, L.: Genetic
diversity of eleven European pig breeds, Genet. Sel. Evol., 32, 187–203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2000113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2000113</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Mahmoud, A. H., Swelum, A., Farah, M. A., Alanazi, K., Rady, A., Salah, M.,
Amor, N., and Mohammed, O. B.: Genetic diversity among Sawakni, Berberi and
Najdi sheep breeds in Saudi Arabia using microsatellites markers, Afr. J.
Biotechnol., 16, 171–178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15785</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Nei, M.: Genetic distance between populations, Am. Nat., 106, 283–292, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ozerov, M. Y., Marzanov, N. S., Tapio, M., Burabaev, A. A., Marzanova, L. K.,
Amerkhanov, K. A., and Kantanen, Yu: Genetic features of Kazakh sheep breeds
according to microsatellites, Russian Agricultural Sciences, 34, 45–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367408010175" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367408010175</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S. D. E.: The Excel microsatellite Toolkit (version 3.1), Animal
Genomics Laboratory, University College, Dublin, Ireland, 2001, available at:
<a href="http://animalgenomics.ucd.ie/sdepark/ms-toolkit/" target="_blank">http://animalgenomics.ucd.ie/sdepark/ms-toolkit/</a>, last access: April
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Peakall, R. and Smouse, P.: GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel.
Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update,
Bioinformatics, 28, 2537–2539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Putman, A. I. and Carbone, I.: Challenges in analysis and interpretation of
microsatellite data for population genetic studies, Ecol. Evol., 4,
4399–428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1305</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Rekha, S., Brijesh, K., Reena, A., Sonika, A., Mishra, A. K., and Tantia, M.
S.: Genetic diversity estimates point to immediate efforts for conserving the
endangered Tibetan sheep of India, Meta Gene, 8, 14–20,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2016.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2016.01.002</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Rushdi, H. E. and Sabry, A. M.: Analysis of the genetic diversity of three
Egyptian sheep breeds using microsatellite markers, International Journal of
Advanced Research, 3, 112–120, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Sadeghi, B.: Genetic Diversity of Tandureh Mouflon Population, Acta Vet.
Eurasia, 44, 20–25, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Saitou, N. and Nei, M.: The neighbor-joining method: A new method for
reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406–425,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Salamon, D., Gutierrez-Gil, B., Arranz, J. J., Barreta, J., Batinic, V., and
Dzidic, A.: Genetic diversity and differentiation of 12 eastern Adriatic and
western Dinaric native sheep breeds using microsatellites, Animal, 8,
200–207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113002243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113002243</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sassi-Zaidy, Y. B., Maretto, F., Zanetti, E., Hajji, G. M.,
Charfi-Cheikrouha, F., and Cassandro, M.: Genetic structure and variability
within and among populations of the fat-tailed Barbarine sheep breed using
microsatellites markers, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 13, 44–54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13363</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Vajed Ebrahimi, M. T., Mohammadabadi, M., and Esmailizadeh, A.: Using
microsatellite markers to analyze genetic diversity in 14 sheep types in
Iran, Arch. Anim. Breed., 60, 183–189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-183-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-183-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Vani, S.,  Punyakumari, B.,  Gnanaprakash, M., and  Rao, V. H.: Microsatellite marker
analysis in Nellore breed of sheep, International Journal of Science,
Environment and Technology, 6, 702–707, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, S.: The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with
special regard to systems of mating, Evolution, 19, 395–420,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01731.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01731.x</a>, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Yilmaz, O., Cemal, I., and Karaca, O.: Genetic diversity in nine native
Turkish sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis, Ani. Genet., 45,
604–608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12173</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Zhong, T., Han, J. L., Guo, J., Zhao, Q. J., Fu, B. L., Pu, Y. B., He, X. H.,
Jeon, J. T., Guan, W. J., and Ma Y. H.: Tracing genetic differentiation of
Chinese Mongolian sheep using microsatellites, Anim. Genet., 42, 563–565,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02181.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02181.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
