<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AAB</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Archives Animal Breeding</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AAB</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Arch. Anim. Breed.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2363-9822</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/aab-61-459-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>The effects of natural mating and artificial <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> insemination using cryopreserved buck semen <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> on reproductive performance in Alpine goats</article-title><alt-title>The effects of natural mating and artificial insemination</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The effects of natural mating and artificial insemination}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~J.~Agossou and N.~Koluman}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Agossou</surname><given-names>Dehouegnon Jerry</given-names></name>
          <email>bermondjerry@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Koluman</surname><given-names>Nazan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Animal Science, Çukurova University, Adana, 01330, Turkey</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dehouegnon Jerry Agossou (bermondjerry@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>61</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>459</fpage><lpage>461</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/61/459/2018/aab-61-459-2018.html">This article is available from https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/61/459/2018/aab-61-459-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/61/459/2018/aab-61-459-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/61/459/2018/aab-61-459-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e87">This study compared the effects of natural mating and
artificial insemination using frozen buck semen on reproductive performance
in Alpine goats. Sixty reproductive Alpine goats were grouped according to
natural mating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and artificial insemination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) breeding
methods. Oestrus was synchronised in experimental goats using a vaginal
sponge impregnated with 20 mg of progestogen FGA (fluorogestone acetate) for 11 days. At the time of
sponge insertion, 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g of prostaglandin F<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (PGF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) analogue was injected
intramuscularly. Forty-eight hours prior to vaginal sponge withdrawal,
500 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) was injected into the animals. At the end of synchronisation
protocol, goats were fertilised using frozen semen or mated with a
well-performing buck (ratio: 1 male to 5 females). The pregnancy
(pregnant/synchronised goats) and mortality rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
higher (93 % vs. 70 %; 2 % vs. 4 %) in the naturally mated goats than the
artificially inseminated group. Kids' live weight at birth was similar
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg) in both groups. The oestrus
synchronisation followed by natural mating achieved better reproductive
performance than the goats artificially inseminated using frozen semen.
However, the artificially inseminated animals displayed an acceptable twinning rate.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e189">Optimal reproductive performance in goats is an important trait, which
affects the economic profitability of farms (Yotov et al., 2016). Goat
reproduction can be controlled using recently developed methods known as
assisted reproductive technologies. Semen cryopreservation and artificial
insemination (AI) are two methods used in the biotechnology of reproduction.
Semen cryopreservation involves cooling and storing semen from elite sires
in liquid nitrogen at a low temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">196</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Sikarwar et
al., 2015). This preserves the semen indefinitely, and it can be used for
future AI needs. AI involves transferring semen into the reproductive tract
of female animals. These methodologies enable accelerated production of
genetically valuable offspring and improve reproductive performance.
Nevertheless, the effectiveness of AI with frozen semen in achieving
satisfactory pregnancy rates in goats remains unknown (Yotov et al., 2016).
Different factors including the type of extender, interactions between
cryoprotectants, cooling rate, thawing rate, and the physiological
status of animals are important for successful semen
cryopreservation and AI. In addition, many other factors – including
nutrition; breeding season; climate conditions; parity; breed; farm; and
depth of semen deposition, extender composition, or hormonal treatments –
affect AI success (Baril et al., 1996; Menchaca and Rubianes, 2007; Arrebola
et al., 2013). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of using frozen buck
semen on the reproductive performance of artificially inseminated Alpine
goats relative to naturally mated goats.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e214">Reproduction parameters of naturally and artificially (AI) inseminated Alpine goats.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Natural</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">breeding</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pregnancy rate (pregnant/synchronised goats) (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.041</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Litter size (no. of kids)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Twinning rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.040</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mortality rate (weaned/born kids) (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.034</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Litter weight at birth (kg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.230</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Litter weight at weaning (kg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.039</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e522">The experimental procedures in this study were approved by the animal
welfare and ethics committee of the Faculty of Agriculture of Çukurova
University. This study was carried out from August 2016 to February 2017 at
the Dairy Goat Research Farm, Faculty of Agriculture,<?pagebreak page460?> Çukurova
University, located in the province of Adana, in the eastern Mediterranean
region of Turkey (40 m in altitude; 36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Sixty
reproductive Alpine females (2–4 years old) and 12 Alpine bucks
(3–6 years old) weighing an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg were included in
this study. Goats were divided into two groups of 30 goats: either naturally
mated with well-performing males or artificially inseminated using frozen
semen. Oestrous synchronisation was performed based on the AI timing
protocol. Over 11 days, goats were synchronised using a vaginal sponge
impregnated with 20 mg of progestogen FGA (fluorogestone acetate, Chronogest
CR, Intervet, France). Upon insertion of the sponge, 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g of
prostaglandin F<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (PGF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) analogue was injected intramuscularly. At day 9 (i.e. 48 h
prior to vaginal sponge withdrawal, 500 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) was administrated to the
animals. To detect the does in standing oestrus, a teaser buck equipped with
an apron was introduced into the experimental groups twice per day: in the
morning at 08:00–09:00 LT and evening at 17:00–18:00 LT. Within 48 to
52 h following the synchronisation protocol, goats detected as standing in
oestrus were inseminated with frozen–thawed semen following the intrauterine
AI methods described by Tsuma et al. (2015). Only semen with a high mobile
spermatozoa score (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % mobile spermatozoa), sperm motility
(3.0 or above), and concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spermatozoa ml<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used.
For naturally mated goats, a ratio of 1 male to 5 females was applied. All
females were doubly mated within 48 h following oestrus detection. Eight
hours after the first mating, they were mated for the second time with the
same buck. Pregnancy was confirmed by trans-abdominal ultrasound (5.0 MHz)
35–40 days after insemination.</p>
      <p id="d1e642">Reproductive parameters including pregnancy, twinning, and mortality rate
were subjected to analysis of frequency (percentages) calculations. An
analysis of variance was performed concerning the other reproductive
parameters (live weight of kids at birth). Differences between treatment
group means were tested using Chi-square test at a level of 5 % using the program SPSS 20.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e651">Data on reproductive parameters of Alpine goats after natural mating and
artificial insemination with frozen semen following oestrus synchronisation
are given in Table 1. The pregnancy rates for naturally mated and
artificially inseminated goats were 93 % and 70 %, respectively. The
pregnancy rate in naturally bred goats was higher than AI goats. The
pregnancy rate and number of newly born kids are the most important
indicators with which to evaluate reproductive performance in animal agriculture (Yotov
et al., 2016). The calculated pregnancy rate in naturally bred goat groups
was higher than the 85.7 % recorded by Fonseca et al. (2005) in Alpine
goats treated with intravaginal sponges (MAP, 60 mg) for 9 days plus
200 IU eCG and 22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g d-cloprostenol 24 h before sponge removal and
similar to the 93.44 % reported by Duričić et al. (2012) in Boer
goats reared in a semi-intensive environment in Croatia. The results show
that the mortality rate (4 % vs. 2 %) was significantly higher in AI goats
than in the natural breeding group. A similar trend was observed for the
twinning rate (2.14 vs. 1.82), for which the obtained values were
significantly different among treatment groups.</p>
      <p id="d1e661">Several reasons may justify the low pregnancy and kidding rate obtained in
the AI group relative to natural breeding. Goats must be inseminated 12 h
after the onset of oestrus and 5–10 h before the expected
ovulation (Lehloenya et al., 2005). In this trial, AI was performed 48–52 h
after withdrawal of the vaginal sponge, i.e. 24–28 h after the
onset of oestrus was detected. The high pregnancy rate from natural mating
could be ascribed to the protective role of fresh semen plasma.</p>
      <p id="d1e664">The average live weight at birth and weaning was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg
for natural breeding, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg for AI, respectively.
Kids born in the natural breeding group were heavier
than those in the AI group. Many previous studies have established a
negative correlation between birth weight and litter size; birth weight
decreases as litter size increases (Freetly and Leymaster, 2004; Mellado et
al., 2011). Therefore, the large litter size observed in this study explains
the low birth weight recorded in the AI group. In addition, Lehloenya et al. (2005)
argue that kids from multiple births tend to be weaker at birth than
single<?pagebreak page461?> kids. This weakness usually leads to a low survival and high
mortality rate for multiple kids as a result of physiological starvation in
the uterus and birth with lower energy reserves. This supports the higher
mortality rate observed in the AI group in the present study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e721">This study shows that oestrus synchronisation followed by natural mating was
more effective (high pregnancy and survival rates and birth weight) than the
use of AI after oestrus synchronisation in goats. However, AI animals
demonstrated an acceptable twinning rate. Several driving factors have been
identified as potentially affecting reproduction and milk production in dairy goats.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e729">Data from this research study can be obtained by request
from the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e735">NK and DJA conceived and designed the study, acquired,
analysed, and interpreted data. DJA drafted the manuscript, and NK contributed
with critical revisions.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e741">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e747">This research was financially supported by Çukurova University, Scientific
Research Project Unit (grant numbers: FYL-2017-7997). <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Manfred Mielenz <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Arrebola, F., González, O., Torres, R., and Abecia, J. A.: Artificial
Insemination in Payoya Goats: Factors Affecting Fertility, Anim. Prod. Sci.,
54, 356–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/AN13138</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Baril, G., Remy, B., Leboeuf, B., Beckers, J. F., and Saumande, J.: Synchromzation
of oestrus in goats: the relationship between ECG binding in plasma, time of
occurrence of oestrus and fertility following artificial insemination,
Theriogenology, 45, 1553–1559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90414-Z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0093-691X(93)90414-Z</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Duričić, D. J., Grizelj, T., Dobranić, I., Harapin, S., Vince, P.,
Kočila, I., Folnožić, M., Lipar, G., Gregurić, G., and
Samardžija, M.: Reproductive Performance of Boer Goats in a Moderate
Climate Zone, Veterinarski Arh., 82, 351–358, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Fonseca, J. F., Torres, C. A. A., Costa, E. P., Maffili, V. V., Carvalho, G. R.,
Alves, N. G., and Rubert, M. A.: Progesterone profile and reproductive performance
of estrous-induced Alpine goats given hCG five days after breeding, Anim. Reprod.,
2, 54–59, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Freetly, H. C. and Leymaster, K. A.: Relationship between litter birth weight
and litter size in six breeds of sheep, J. Anim. Sci., 82, 612–618,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.822612x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2527/2004.822612x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Lehloenya, K. C., Greyling, J. P. C., and Schwalbach, L. M. J.: Reproductive
Performance of South African Indigenous Goats following Oestrous Synchronisation
and AI, Small Rumin. Res., 57, 115–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.05.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.05.004</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Mellado, M., Meza-Herrera, C. A., Arévalo, J. R., De Santiago-Miramontes,
M. A., Rodríguez, A., Luna-Orozco, J. R., and Veliz-Deras, F. G.: Relationship
between Litter Birthweight and Litter Size in five Goat Genotypes, Anim. Prod.
Sci., 51, 144–149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/AN10112</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Menchaca, A. and Rubianes, E.: Pregnancy Rate obtained with Short-Term Protocol
for Timed Artificial Insemination in Goats, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 42, 590–593,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00827.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00827.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Sikarwar, A. K. S., Ramachandran, N., Ranjan, R., Gangwar, C., and Agrawal, J.
K.: Effect of Different Levels of Glycerol and DMSO on Freezability of Buck Semen,
Livestock Res. Int., 3, 71–73, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Tsuma, V. T., Khan, M. S., Okeyo, A. M., and Ibrahim, M. N. M.: A training
manual on artificial insemination in goats, ILRI Manual 19, International
Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 10–16, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Yotov, S. A., Velislavova, D. V., and Dimova, L. R.: Pregnancy Rate in Bulgarian
White Milk Goats with Natural and Synchronized Oestrus after Artificial
Insemination by Frozen Semen during Breeding Season, Asian Pac. J. Reprod., 5,
144–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjr.2016.01.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apjr.2016.01.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The effects of natural mating and artificial  insemination using cryopreserved buck semen  on reproductive performance in Alpine goats</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>This study compared the effects of natural mating and
artificial insemination using frozen buck semen on reproductive performance
in Alpine goats. Sixty reproductive Alpine goats were grouped according to
natural mating (<i>n</i> = 30) and artificial insemination (<i>n</i> = 30) breeding
methods. Oestrus was synchronised in experimental goats using a vaginal
sponge impregnated with 20&thinsp;mg of progestogen FGA (fluorogestone acetate) for 11 days. At the time of
sponge insertion, 150&thinsp;µg of prostaglandin F<sub>2<i>α</i></sub> (PGF<sub>2<i>α</i></sub>) analogue was injected
intramuscularly. Forty-eight hours prior to vaginal sponge withdrawal,
500 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) was injected into the animals. At the end of synchronisation
protocol, goats were fertilised using frozen semen or mated with a
well-performing buck (ratio: 1 male to 5 females). The pregnancy
(pregnant/synchronised goats) and mortality rates (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) were
higher (93&thinsp;% vs. 70&thinsp;%; 2&thinsp;% vs. 4&thinsp;%) in the naturally mated goats than the
artificially inseminated group. Kids' live weight at birth was similar
(3.83±0.23 and 3.15±0.11&thinsp;kg) in both groups. The oestrus
synchronisation followed by natural mating achieved better reproductive
performance than the goats artificially inseminated using frozen semen.
However, the artificially inseminated animals displayed an acceptable twinning rate.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arrebola, F., González, O., Torres, R., and Abecia, J. A.: Artificial
Insemination in Payoya Goats: Factors Affecting Fertility, Anim. Prod. Sci.,
54, 356–362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13138</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baril, G., Remy, B., Leboeuf, B., Beckers, J. F., and Saumande, J.: Synchromzation
of oestrus in goats: the relationship between ECG binding in plasma, time of
occurrence of oestrus and fertility following artificial insemination,
Theriogenology, 45, 1553–1559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90414-Z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90414-Z</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Duričić, D. J., Grizelj, T., Dobranić, I., Harapin, S., Vince, P.,
Kočila, I., Folnožić, M., Lipar, G., Gregurić, G., and
Samardžija, M.: Reproductive Performance of Boer Goats in a Moderate
Climate Zone, Veterinarski Arh., 82, 351–358, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Fonseca, J. F., Torres, C. A. A., Costa, E. P., Maffili, V. V., Carvalho, G. R.,
Alves, N. G., and Rubert, M. A.: Progesterone profile and reproductive performance
of estrous-induced Alpine goats given hCG five days after breeding, Anim. Reprod.,
2, 54–59, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Freetly, H. C. and Leymaster, K. A.: Relationship between litter birth weight
and litter size in six breeds of sheep, J. Anim. Sci., 82, 612–618,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.822612x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.822612x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Lehloenya, K. C., Greyling, J. P. C., and Schwalbach, L. M. J.: Reproductive
Performance of South African Indigenous Goats following Oestrous Synchronisation
and AI, Small Rumin. Res., 57, 115–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.05.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.05.004</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Mellado, M., Meza-Herrera, C. A., Arévalo, J. R., De Santiago-Miramontes,
M. A., Rodríguez, A., Luna-Orozco, J. R., and Veliz-Deras, F. G.: Relationship
between Litter Birthweight and Litter Size in five Goat Genotypes, Anim. Prod.
Sci., 51, 144–149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10112</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Menchaca, A. and Rubianes, E.: Pregnancy Rate obtained with Short-Term Protocol
for Timed Artificial Insemination in Goats, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 42, 590–593,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00827.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00827.x</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Sikarwar, A. K. S., Ramachandran, N., Ranjan, R., Gangwar, C., and Agrawal, J.
K.: Effect of Different Levels of Glycerol and DMSO on Freezability of Buck Semen,
Livestock Res. Int., 3, 71–73, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Tsuma, V. T., Khan, M. S., Okeyo, A. M., and Ibrahim, M. N. M.: A training
manual on artificial insemination in goats, ILRI Manual 19, International
Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 10–16, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Yotov, S. A., Velislavova, D. V., and Dimova, L. R.: Pregnancy Rate in Bulgarian
White Milk Goats with Natural and Synchronized Oestrus after Artificial
Insemination by Frozen Semen during Breeding Season, Asian Pac. J. Reprod., 5,
144–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjr.2016.01.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjr.2016.01.011</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
